No mention of results in the club statement 21:26 - Feb 28 with 513 views | thebooks | “It has, however, become clear after holding discussions over the last few days that there are significant differences of opinion as to the order of immediate priorities and we agreed it was best for us to part company. I would like to wish both Paul and Stuart the best in the future.” https://www.itfc.co.uk/news/2021/february/paul-lambert-leaves-ipswich-town/ So looks like Evans didn’t actually want to get rid of PL? Typically odd. | | | | |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:28 - Feb 28 with 443 views | Freddy | Well played by Lambert, made it clear he wasn't happy with the structure of the club and having a swipe at Evans to ensure he leaves by mutual consent so has agreed a pay off | | | |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:32 - Feb 28 with 378 views | RonFearonsHair | What does "the order of immediate priorities" mean? | | | |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:33 - Feb 28 with 360 views | TractorWood |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:32 - Feb 28 by RonFearonsHair | What does "the order of immediate priorities" mean? |
Typical nebulous waffle. | |
| |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:35 - Feb 28 with 330 views | Freddy |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:33 - Feb 28 by TractorWood | Typical nebulous waffle. |
So looking for a new manager - what about the takeover in March or isn't that happening? | | | |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:35 - Feb 28 with 327 views | thebooks |
No mention of results in the club statement on 21:32 - Feb 28 by RonFearonsHair | What does "the order of immediate priorities" mean? |
That’s what I mean. You normally get a “results not acceptable, thanks for the hard work”, but this sounds like a genuine disagreement. Immediate priorities could mean actually getting promoted versus “building” for the future, I guess. | | | |
| |