Forum | Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? by Swansea_Blue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? 21:30 - Mar 17 with 1314 views

Swansea_Blue

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:31 - Mar 17 with 1298 views

Illinoisblue

An absolute scandal of a decision. Utterly wrong.

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:33 - Mar 17 with 1258 views

Swansea_Blue

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:31 - Mar 17 by Illinoisblue
An absolute scandal of a decision. Utterly wrong.

Bonkers wasn’t it? So wrong it wasn’t obvious what was being checked.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:36 - Mar 17 with 1237 views

braveblue

Very strange. Should hear more when game ends. But suspect they decided he became active but I thought that had been changed.

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:39 - Mar 17 with 1205 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Ball was played forward off a Forest player while the player who ended up receiving it was well offside. Seemed fairly straightforward but took a long time to call the ref over to make a decision. Seemed to revolve around whether a deflection changed it. Why would a deflection change the fact he was offside?

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:45 - Mar 17 with 1176 views

iamatractorboy

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:39 - Mar 17 by Nthsuffolkblue
Ball was played forward off a Forest player while the player who ended up receiving it was well offside. Seemed fairly straightforward but took a long time to call the ref over to make a decision. Seemed to revolve around whether a deflection changed it. Why would a deflection change the fact he was offside?

I thought an attacker couldn't be offside if a defender deliberately played the ball (as opposed to a deflection). There were actually two Forest defenders that played the ball deliberately. Who knows! Confused.

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:46 - Mar 17 with 1169 views

le2blue

Longstaff was in an offside position and deemed interfering with play when the forest player cleared the ball to Isak. Not sure about that one.

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:47 - Mar 17 with 1158 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:45 - Mar 17 by iamatractorboy
I thought an attacker couldn't be offside if a defender deliberately played the ball (as opposed to a deflection). There were actually two Forest defenders that played the ball deliberately. Who knows! Confused.

There was a Newcastle player who played the ball forward. Whether a defender kicked against that player is irrelevant isn't it? I guess the question was whether the Newcastle player actually played it but it looked to me that he did (deliberately or otherwise).

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:50 - Mar 17 with 1105 views

iamatractorboy

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:47 - Mar 17 by Nthsuffolkblue
There was a Newcastle player who played the ball forward. Whether a defender kicked against that player is irrelevant isn't it? I guess the question was whether the Newcastle player actually played it but it looked to me that he did (deliberately or otherwise).

It's the first Forest defender's touch really which could be interpreted as not being influenced by Longstaff. I can see what you're saying about the second one though as Longstaff definitely influenced that one.

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:51 - Mar 17 with 1085 views

Swansea_Blue

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:46 - Mar 17 by le2blue
Longstaff was in an offside position and deemed interfering with play when the forest player cleared the ball to Isak. Not sure about that one.

That must be why it was given. A wrong decision though - 2 opposition players play the ball before it reached him. If we’re going to have those as offsides then Forest’s goal should have been ruled off too.

Hopefully they’ll score this pen.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:55 - Mar 17 with 1034 views

Illinoisblue

The handball decision was pretty harsh too.

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:56 - Mar 17 with 1023 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:50 - Mar 17 by iamatractorboy
It's the first Forest defender's touch really which could be interpreted as not being influenced by Longstaff. I can see what you're saying about the second one though as Longstaff definitely influenced that one.

It was when Isak played it forward. He intended to cross it but it deflected to a Newcastle player who was clearly interfering as the defender has to clear the ball. He was offside. Seemed fairly clear to me.

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 22:03 - Mar 17 with 986 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:55 - Mar 17 by Illinoisblue
The handball decision was pretty harsh too.

Loved the defender's reaction. I wondered whether, if there was no VAR, he would have reacted so obviously.

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 22:55 - Mar 17 with 861 views

Swansea_Blue

Anyone just seen the VAR decision in the Forest game? on 21:56 - Mar 17 by Nthsuffolkblue
It was when Isak played it forward. He intended to cross it but it deflected to a Newcastle player who was clearly interfering as the defender has to clear the ball. He was offside. Seemed fairly clear to me.

Isak crosses it and Felipe clears it. So that’s Felipe deliberately playing the ball imo. He kicked it, it wasn’t a defection. I could see why Longstaff could be seen to be interfering with the defender who then tried to clear it. But that’s irrelevant if Felipe deliberately played the ball, which he did.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread