Forum | Goal didn't really act as a settler, did it? by Radlett_blue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Goal didn't really act as a settler, did it? 20:51 - Apr 30 with 424 views

We became too careful & players all waiting for someone else to do something.
We have to be more positive in the second half.

Poll:

Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

Goal didn't really act as a settler, did it? on 20:53 - Apr 30 with 390 views

Swansea_Blue

No it didn’t. We sat off way too much for 20 mins (as per Hull). But held firm thankfully. Unlucky from that header from Broady at the end there. I don’t think he could have done much more. Maybe put it back across the goal, but he’d have lost power doing that.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Goal didn't really act as a settler, did it? on 21:02 - Apr 30 with 311 views

ipswichtillidie

No.. we we sit back we look more vulnerable for me although that said they are rapid and we are very aware we could get countered on. I think if we can get possession to Hutch and Wes more we look like opening them up. Hirst wil be a big substitution on 60mins. Probably Chappers for Broady too.

Gav

Goal didn't really act as a settler, did it? on 21:12 - Apr 30 with 282 views

TheBoyBlue

It makes me nervous when we score and then don't get another. We have a team on the ropes and then let them back in. Hopefully we can get a second we can put this game to bed.

Blog:

[Blog] The Homer Simpson of the Championship

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread