By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It is a joke. That should have been a penalty for Ipswich. It is ironic how it is the same two players involved as the one given to Man City. Savinho comes in with the challenge on Davis and I think there is more contact here than the first one. I'm bemused by that decision.
VAR... by BlueBoots24 Aug 2024 15:47 ...Davis taken out worse than the foul he conceded himself, and VAR check over in seconds without referral to the ref...joke
Bad enough that the ref missed it, but for the video check to see nothing is frankly ridiculous...
So why didn't that get a VAR pen?? on 15:51 - Aug 24 by Marshalls_Mullet
Keowns view:
It is a joke. That should have been a penalty for Ipswich. It is ironic how it is the same two players involved as the one given to Man City. Savinho comes in with the challenge on Davis and I think there is more contact here than the first one. I'm bemused by that decision.
So why didn't that get a VAR pen?? on 15:51 - Aug 24 by Marshalls_Mullet
Keowns view:
It is a joke. That should have been a penalty for Ipswich. It is ironic how it is the same two players involved as the one given to Man City. Savinho comes in with the challenge on Davis and I think there is more contact here than the first one. I'm bemused by that decision.
We're watching it live, absolutely nailed on penalty. How the guy on VAR deems that less of a foul than theirs (which was a penalty) beggars belief.
0
So why didn't that get a VAR pen?? on 16:07 - Aug 24 with 643 views