Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum
Thread
Better lunchtime call than sitting in front of your screens guys -
at 12:21 18 Feb 2019

Forum
Thread
Will there be a minute's silence for Gordon Banks today?
at 13:10 16 Feb 2019

And/or black armbands? Just wondered.
Prediction
Prediction Logged by at 13:02:45
Ipswich Town v Stoke City prediction logged
Forum
Thread
Blackpool in receivership
at 16:40 15 Feb 2019

http://www.fsf.org.uk/latest-news/view/Court-paves-way-for-end-of-oystons-at-Bla

Prediction
Prediction Logged by at 15:46:18
Ipswich Town v Derby County prediction logged
Forum
Thread
This should be nominated for the Baftas -
at 14:41 10 Feb 2019



I don't usually use the word "scum", but when the cap fits ...
Forum
Thread
Well if that doesn't fire our players up, nothing will!
at 12:57 10 Feb 2019

Prediction
Prediction Logged by at 11:42:08
Norwich City v Ipswich Town prediction logged
Forum
Thread
Well blow me down, there might be one bit of manufacturing in the UK re-starting
at 23:18 8 Feb 2019

As a result of Brexit - Landrover Defenders could resume production, according to my local garage, when we leave the EU. Main reason they stopped being produced wasn't the fact that they're diesel, but the EU requirement that they're fitted with airbags & other safety features.
Forum
Thread
Where's Eric Clapton when you need him?!
at 17:51 3 Feb 2019


Forum
Thread
Anyway, on a brighter note -
at 22:43 2 Feb 2019

Genesis on BBC4 starting in 2 minutes

[Post edited 2 Feb 22:46]
Forum
Thread
Well this is really going to test PL's mettle now isn't it
at 17:38 2 Feb 2019

How to keep players' chins up? and fans on side ... tough job.
Forum
Thread
Is Gmail shutting down??!
at 23:53 1 Feb 2019

Or is it just googlemail?

https://blog.google/technology/safety-security/expediting-changes-google-plus/
Prediction
Prediction Logged by at 22:35:18
Ipswich Town v Sheffield Wednesday prediction logged
Forum
Thread
Haha, neat!
at 11:46 1 Feb 2019

Forum
Thread
Another lovely article to warm t'cockles of your hearts (MPs/peers/corruption/EU
at 12:18 28 Jan 2019



https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jan/27/revealed-the-mps-and-peers-r
[Post edited 28 Jan 12:27]
Forum
Thread
"Why a no-deal Brexit is nothing to fear" - Spectator (not necessarily my view!)
at 11:52 28 Jan 2019

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/08/whos-afraid-of-the-wto/?fbclid=IwAR2K_7NPgBb

If people unable to read due to paywall -

'A viable alternative to an EU trade deal is ready and waiting'
by David Collins (article dated 04/08/2018)

"Warnings by Remainers about the consequences of a ‘no deal’ Brexit are beginning to resemble a game of oneupmanship worthy of Monty Python’s Yorkshiremen. Not content with claims that the M20 to Dover will be gridlocked with lorries waiting to undergo customs checks and that the North Ireland peace process will break down, Doug Gurr, Amazon’s chief in the UK, apparently told Dominic Raab at a recent meeting that there will be ‘civil unrest’ within a fortnight of Britain leaving the EU without a deal. Next, they will have us living 150 to a shoebox.

Those who peddle this relentless doom-mongering fail to understand the protections which will remain in place for the UK under international law. Far from ‘crashing out of the EU’, failing to secure a free trade deal with the EU simply means that the UK will trade with the EU on terms set out by the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

The pundit class tends to scoff at the WTO option. They dismiss it as a recipe for chaos. But that is to ignore the huge progress that this body has made in promoting global trade over the past two decades. The government should from the beginning have presented the WTO option as a viable counterpoint to the EU’s hardline, all-or-nothing stance.

The WTO oversees a system of trade rules for its 164-member countries, which together account for no less than 98 per cent of all global trade. Under the WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (the GATT), tariffs on most manufactured goods between the UK and the EU would stay quite low, averaging around 3 per cent.

While EU leaders like to threaten us with hints that our exports would be unsellable in the EU, the fact is that non-tariff barriers such as arbitrary health and safety inspections and borders would be prohibited under the WTO’s Sanitary and Phyto-sanitary (SPS) and Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) agreements. The UK intends to retain conformity with EU regulations following Brexit, at least for the time being, meaning that the existing low levels of health and safety risks to the public in UK products will not change in the days after Brexit. There would, as a result, be no grounds for the EU to exclude our goods from its markets.

The WTO’s new Trade Facilitation Agreement obliges the EU to maintain borders which are as frictionless as possible, using modern technologies such as pre–arrival processing of documents and electronic payments. Discrimination against foreign products through all sorts of internal regulations is forbidden. These rules are enforced by a well-respected international tribunal which has a high rate of compliance and cannot be overruled by the European Court of Justice.

While tariffs on some EU goods — agricultural goods and automobiles in particular — would be higher than 3 per cent, economic gains secured from an independent trade policy and a more pro-competitive environment should compensate UK consumers.

The WTO’s coverage of services is incomplete and would not grant UK firms the level of EU market access they enjoy under the single market, but the UK is well placed to take a leading role in developing the new Trade in Services Agreement, due to resume over the next few years, as well as multilateral negotiations for services at the WTO. Roberto Azevedo, the director general of the WTO, announced that he is looking forward to having the UK back as an independent champion of free trade.

Breaking free of the EU customs union will enable the UK to boost trade with other countries around the world, taking advantage of WTO rules which allow countries to offer preferential trading arrangements to nations with which they negotiate a Free Trade Agreement (FTA). In charge of its own trade policy, the UK should be able to roll over many of the EU’s 60-plus FTAs with third countries, some of which have already indicated that they intend to offer the UK terms as good as they did to the EU.

Canada has even suggested that the UK may get a better deal than that which was offered to the EU under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) two years ago. The UK Department of International Trade has already begun discussions with several countries with which the EU has failed to do trade deals, most notably the US. Since 90 per cent of world GDP growth in the coming decades is expected to be outside the EU, it makes sense that the UK looks beyond this region, which now accounts for less than half of its overall trade. The UK will no longer be required, as it is at the moment under EU rules, to impose tariffs on products which it does not produce, such as tropical fruit — reducing prices for consumers and giving us leverage when it comes to negotiating trade deals. The country will be in a strong position to do trade deals faster than the EU has managed because it will not be encumbered by a long-winded ratification process involving 27 member states.

Why, then, has the government damaged its negotiating position by seeming to exclude the WTO option and giving the impression that it is desperate to extract a trade deal with the EU at all costs? The UK has approached the EU as a supplicant, or worse, a wounded animal. Theresa May’s Chequers deal would have us clinging to a weak version of the single market and customs union, which would deprive us of the freedom we ought to win through Brexit. Even that is not enough for Michel Barnier.

Yet it is the EU which has more to fear from these negotiations, being nervous about having a large, liberated, pro-competitive economy on its doorstep. The government should have initiated this process, proposing an FTA based on CETA but better, with deeper access for services such as finance, and lower tariffs on a broader range of products. At the same time, the government should have been making parallel arrangements for a no-deal WTO option.

Thankfully, there are signs that UK negotiators are now moving in this direction. The UK government announced recently that it has submitted its schedule of tariff commitments for certification by the WTO. The UK’s new Trade Remedies Authority — set up to regulate international trade disputes — will shortly be up and running and the ports are being built up to handle the minimal extra customs checks which will be needed.

In any negotiation, there is no strategy worse than giving the impression that you are desperate for a deal at all costs. With the WTO option as an entirely acceptable, workable alternative to a trade deal, the UK is truly in a position to walk away. And that’s a good place to be."

David Collins is a professor of International Economic Law at City, University of London.
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

Ryorry


Site Scores

Forum Votes: 2838
Comment Votes: 231
Prediction League: 29
TOTAL: 3098
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2019