| Continuation of the foul?! 16:15 - Oct 26 with 718 views | WonnorCickhamm |
That is absurd.
It started outside the area! |  |
| |  |
| Continuation of the foul?! on 16:16 - Oct 26 with 663 views | DublinBlue84 |
He was holding him before he got in the box, but then forcibly pulled him down in the box.
Two fouls for me, but you can argue the first foul was outside the box.; | |
| |
| Continuation of the foul?! on 16:16 - Oct 26 with 660 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
If that's the case, advantage until he gets to the area? |  |
| |
| Continuation of the foul?! on 16:18 - Oct 26 with 569 views | Hugoagogo_Reborn |
It is possible to award a foul as a penalty if it starts outside the box but continues into the penalty area.
In this case, Clarke puts his arm out across his neck outside the area, but has moved his body in front of him and committed the more serious offence inside the box.
Was always going to be a penalty in my book. |  | | |
| Continuation of the foul?! on 16:20 - Oct 26 with 484 views | DublinBlue84 |
| Continuation of the foul?! on 16:18 - Oct 26 by Hugoagogo_Reborn |
It is possible to award a foul as a penalty if it starts outside the box but continues into the penalty area.
In this case, Clarke puts his arm out across his neck outside the area, but has moved his body in front of him and committed the more serious offence inside the box.
Was always going to be a penalty in my book. |
Agree, initial foul outside the box of holding, but in the box Clarke literally pulls him down.
Idiot. I can forgive taking a booking and giving a yellow away outside the box as taking one for the team, but pulling the guy down when in the box is the height of stupidity.
No brains. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
