| Pathetic decision at Newcastle. 21:30 - Jan 13 with 1000 views | StochesStotasBlewe |
Offside my arse. Baffling beyond belief.
|  |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
| |  |
| Pathetic decision at Newcastle. on 21:33 - Jan 13 with 975 views | Durovigutum |
So, I thought the same, but the zoom out shows the keeper is in front of the defender. Remember it is the 2nd last player and you normally think that the keeper is the first but the keeper was in front of Haland.
It is still subjective however! |  | | |
| Pathetic decision at Newcastle. on 21:39 - Jan 13 with 896 views | Nfinley13 |
| Pathetic decision at Newcastle. on 21:33 - Jan 13 by Durovigutum |
So, I thought the same, but the zoom out shows the keeper is in front of the defender. Remember it is the 2nd last player and you normally think that the keeper is the first but the keeper was in front of Haland.
It is still subjective however! |
If that's the case then why did it take so long for them to decide Harland was offside. Surely if that's the rule him being behind Pope would immediately class him as offside. They then wouldn't be looking at his foot being behind the defender to class him as offside |  | | |
| Pathetic decision at Newcastle. on 21:45 - Jan 13 with 844 views | bsw72 |
| Pathetic decision at Newcastle. on 21:33 - Jan 13 by Durovigutum |
So, I thought the same, but the zoom out shows the keeper is in front of the defender. Remember it is the 2nd last player and you normally think that the keeper is the first but the keeper was in front of Haland.
It is still subjective however! |
It’s subjective not for the fact he was fractionally offside but how much he limited the defender or keeper from stopping the shot. Which was pretty much zero. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
