By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Let’s say the billionaire buyers scrabble together to pay £1bn in cash of their own. There’s still £2.5bn in loans being raised. Even at only 3% interest, that’s £75m a year in debt service alone. Then there are repayments. Across a 25-year term, that’s another £100m a year.
If you want to build a stadium (which you really, really do), you’re in for another £1.5bn at least. That costs £22.5m in debt service and £30m in repayments. It’s cheaper debt because it’s collateralised against a fixed asset and across a longer term.
But we’re sitting at a £227.5m-a-year commitment from a Chelsea leveraged buyout. Under Abramovich, Chelsea have typically generated £1.6m a year in cash, net. A new stadium would add probably £80m a year. Winning the CL brings in £70m more.
But even if you win it every year in a shiny new stadium you’d still be £75m+ in the hole every single year before you’ve spent a single dollar cent on transfer fees. All this means only one thing is for sure…
… A Chelsea sale would be one step closer to a European Super League and one more - probably decisive - nail in the coffin of the traditional football pyramid.
Fascinating stuff and sounds like anyone buying it would be mad. Not sure I'd agree with the conclusion though - why would other clubs bend to Chelsea's need for a super league? The fans went ape last time and it would be a chance to knock a potential rival out of the running by opting for the status quo.
Has anyone ever looked at their own postings for last day or so? Oh my... so sorry. Was Ullaa