Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on 18:15 - Feb 11 with 1037 viewsonceablue

I think we win that match if he did

Chaplin had started to find little holes than Harness was never going to do

I think also Hirst was destined to score winner or not in the end
1
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 18:19 - Feb 11 with 987 viewspointofblue

I thought Chaplin was tiring but I have brought on Aluko at that point rather than Harness.

The Hirst sub didn't work at all IMO.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 18:25 - Feb 11 with 933 viewsMcCall

Sorry, Hirst is gash
-5
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 19:11 - Feb 11 with 834 viewsbackwaywhen

Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 18:25 - Feb 11 by McCall

Sorry, Hirst is gash


Best game he has had for us today , slightly wobbly to start , but unsettled their back line with grit and determination, and looked far better than he has done thus far , as regard the whole team , that penalty miss messed with our heads and we started to crumble , score it and we go on to Win IMO , could quite have easily dominated like we did in 2nd half …….. that miss was defining .
0
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:02 - Feb 11 with 766 viewsLeoMuff

Do think they were subs for subs sake, we were all over them, so why change ? Def felt like it cost us momentum, Chaplin in particular should have stayed on imho

The only Muff in Town.
Poll: Lamberts rotational policy has left us....

1
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:07 - Feb 11 with 739 viewsfinidi_whooah

Hirst is a poor mans ladapo
-2
Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:39 - Feb 11 with 693 viewsExiled2Surrey

Chaplin and Hirst should have stayed on on 20:02 - Feb 11 by LeoMuff

Do think they were subs for subs sake, we were all over them, so why change ? Def felt like it cost us momentum, Chaplin in particular should have stayed on imho


That’s also what Mick Mills thinks - i think that Wednesday only made two subs? He made the sensible point that actually the system had only been working for about 30 minutes when the subs came and we slightly conceded the advantage at that point.

I would also say that this loss of momentum also coincided with the time that their player went down for a “head injury”. That was clearly tactical. Maybe we should have done that after the first goal…
1




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025