Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Not great by our high standards. 18:39 - Oct 28 with 842 viewsTheBoyBlue

And Plymouth should be given credit for that. Yet we still won. The confidence I have in this team and manager is such that I was still as sure as one could be that they would find a way back in

They were probably the best team on the counter-attack we've faced here and defended with their lives, but you can take the team out of League One but you can't take the League One out of the team!

Great result, fantastic how many different types of games we find a way to win!

Blog: [Blog] The Homer Simpson of the Championship

0
Not great by our high standards. on 19:33 - Oct 28 with 758 viewsArnieM

I were wouldn’t give Plymouth the drippings off my nose. They was a league one gamesmanship mentality about them today. Very disappointed in them given the side they’ve got.

Poll: Would this current Town team beat the current narwich team

0
Not great by our high standards. on 19:46 - Oct 28 with 713 viewsBigCommon

Last two games, both BC and Argyle have pressed and stifled us quite well, imo. Often , when a team doesn't look at its best, it's down to how hard the oppo' are working ..
Two tough games ticked off with 6pts and no injuries of note...
We just got to keep ticking them off. One at a time. Brum, away, Roth' away, and Swans at home, in the league, before the break..(7pts please).. Then regroup, and go again.
0
Not great by our high standards. on 19:49 - Oct 28 with 700 viewsPrideOfTheEast

Their defence looked pretty poor to me. Everything else was good from them although how we allowed Whittaker to cut in the way he did for his goal! Would have been a very different game if hirst had taken his early chance but overall they deserved something didn’t they. Good luck to them.
0
Not great by our high standards. on 19:56 - Oct 28 with 688 viewsSwansea_Blue

Not great by our high standards. on 19:49 - Oct 28 by PrideOfTheEast

Their defence looked pretty poor to me. Everything else was good from them although how we allowed Whittaker to cut in the way he did for his goal! Would have been a very different game if hirst had taken his early chance but overall they deserved something didn’t they. Good luck to them.


They gave it a good go imo. They packed the midfield and nullified Chappers and Broady. Not many teams have been able to do that. Showing us down the sides worked really well for most of the game. It took Hutch out of the game as well, as he spent most of it in the pocket of their left back, who was excellent. The problem with forcing us out wide is at some point Leif is going to be able to do what he does well - create goals.

It shows how hard we are to handle. Play narrow and we can go round the outside. Try to double up on Leif (or Wes) and it creates space for Broady and Chappers.

Poll: Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

0
Not great by our high standards. on 19:57 - Oct 28 with 680 viewspointofblue

Not great by our high standards. on 19:46 - Oct 28 by BigCommon

Last two games, both BC and Argyle have pressed and stifled us quite well, imo. Often , when a team doesn't look at its best, it's down to how hard the oppo' are working ..
Two tough games ticked off with 6pts and no injuries of note...
We just got to keep ticking them off. One at a time. Brum, away, Roth' away, and Swans at home, in the league, before the break..(7pts please).. Then regroup, and go again.


I do wonder how much we're missing Burns. The right side hasn't looked quite right with either Jackson or Hutchinson there.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025