| Changes don't end up being better 00:01 - Oct 22 with 514 views | FrimleyBlue |
It's a slight concern really that when certain players look off and the forum collectively discuss alternative options, these options play yet they don't end up better than the ones before or even on par and that's a concern imo
Young, I really thought he would be a great experienced head for us, but imo he was poor
mcateer, tbh not many suggested him, but many didn;t rate egeli, yet mcateer was all huff and no quality
sammy s isn't cutting it, akpom comes in, does the same, but with less pressing
clarke comes in, deserves it, but then you're dropping Philogene for no reason, but anyway, clarke comes in and it changes how we use Davis.. not good.
kipre then looks dodgy, esp at set pieces, you bring in greaves, who again doesnt look solid and again we looked dodgy on set pieces
nunez, well most of us knew a cajuste, nunez pivot wasn't going to work
azon, i like him but think he needs a run of games to become something, can we afford that?
KM really has to stick to a core and run with it with the odd change, the 3/4/6/7 change thing isn;t gonna work. |  |
| |  |
| Changes don't end up being better on 00:07 - Oct 22 with 470 views | MrPotatoHead |
Supporters are always like that, the longer a player is out of the team the better they get.
Our recruitment looks very questionable in a number of areas it has to be said. |  | | |
| Changes don't end up being better on 01:26 - Oct 22 with 378 views | gainsboroughblue |
Your middle paragraph sums it up really. We have just collected a load of players at a huge cost that don't compliment one another or the system we play. All good players on paper and written down as an eleven plus the bench, looks all very wow, but as a team, it largely doesn't work. [Post edited 22 Oct 2025 1:27]
|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
