Clegg: Clubs Which Ignore Financial Fair Play Taking a Big Risk Monday, 7th May 2012 09:22
Blues chief executive Simon Clegg believes clubs will be taking a big risk if they chase the dream and ignore the Financial Fair Play rules which come in next season. Championship clubs voted in favour of the new rules last week but with sanctions for breaking them not enforced for two years.
Clegg admits that the two years grace period could potentially tempt clubs to throw everything at getting promoted in the next couple of seasons: “That’s a very good question because it does provide scope for people to chase the dream for the next two years, but you’re not going to chase the dream on one-year contracts.
“Players will expect contracts to be two years or three years, so you’re playing a very, very high risk game if you chase that dream based on the principle that there will be no sanctions for two years and you don’t achieve it because you could end up being placed in a very difficult financial situation where you have to break even at that point.
“This is a staggered approach to allow existing contracts to run out, which is not unreasonable. If you’ve got players on three or four-year contracts, you’ve got to give some time to allow those to run out.
“But the general movement of direction is right for football and it’s right to protect the long-term interest of the game in this country.”
He admits that potentially dire consequences haven’t prevented clubs from chasing dreams before but, with 21 of the 24 Championship clubs voting for the measures, says most evidently want to run on a more sustainable basis: “It hasn’t stopped clubs before, but people have been talking about this for decades, about how football has got to get in control of its finances.
“It’s suddenly coming home to roost that this is happening, and it’s got to happen otherwise you’ll find there’ll be more clubs like Portsmouth and Port Vale.”
In addition to the administration-hit Pompey and Valiants, Clegg is aware of other clubs who will have difficult summers: “We’ve now reached the close season, clubs have got no revenue coming in, or very little revenue coming in between now and August, and I think you’ll find that some clubs will struggle over this close season.
“I’ve spoken to a number of clubs who have struggled to get through to the end of this season and are concerned as to how they are going to struggle through the next three months.”
He expects one of the consequences of the new rules to be clubs increasingly looking to the lower leagues for new recruits: “More looking to bring players up from the lower divisions will probably be one of the implications of Financial Fair Play.
“I think that some players are going to catch a big cold this summer when they realise that the levels of contracts that they’ve had in the past [are no longer available]. No player likes going backwards financially, they all aspire to be earning ever-increasing sums of money. This summer will be a reality check for many of them.”
While the staggered approach to the implementation of the new rules means that clubs like Town with rich owners such as Marcus Evans can still spend limited amounts above and beyond their turnover, ultimately Clegg believes teams dropping out of the Premier League will be difficult to compete against.
“I think we need to be very clear that with the increase in parachute payments to four years, it becomes increasingly hard to get up into the top division,” he said.
“Clubs that are coming down have got considerably enhanced parachute payment softeners that are going to give them a financial advantage. Therefore we need to be up there in the top flight of football sooner rather than later.”
Photo: Action Images
Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.
Blue041273 added 14:09 - May 7
We have no choice but to comply with the new rules. We cannot compete with premier league contracts particularly longer term. There will be clubs (Leicester for one) who will 'chase the dream' and spend beyond their means in the short term, but this will only be viable when putting the finishing touches to a squad, ie adding one or two quality players. Our immediate needs, like most of the clubs in the Championship, are different. We need pretty much half a squad. Given this we cannot afford three or four marquee signings now, particularly if, as suggested, our season ticket sales are down. One year premium contracts to fading premier league stars or even season long loans will be too great a risk. This could be a long summer and next season could be a long one too. Our future in the Championship could well hinge on an ability to identify talent quickly, bring it in cheaply, and develop it to competitive standard as soon as possible. Most Championship clubs are in the same boat. While our resources may be better than others in this league, the obvious question is do we have the structure in place to handle the new challenges and make us competitive. |  | |
itfc1981 added 15:27 - May 7
Sanctions are not brought in for two years! Clegg you cant fool us! Clegg out |  | |
itfc1981 added 15:42 - May 7
"Therefore we need to be up there in the top flight of football sooner rather than later.” no chance |  | |
bluey123 added 16:07 - May 7
With the players we have and a useless manager we will follow Portsmouth into Div1 we are going nowhere quick Im afraid anyone who thinks differently are deluded fools |  | |
yorksblue added 16:13 - May 7
Cheers for putting me straight guys. Yes, I'm afraid Mr Murdoch and the merry bunch of greedy so and sos in Prem League have a lot to answer for. As I've said previously, ditch live TV, greedy and mediocre foreigners (with odd exception) and get back to how things used to be. If clubs have to go bust as a result, then so be it. |  | |
PunchNoHopers added 19:28 - May 7
So you get penalised if you should overspend and get promoted, I would think any Championship club that gets promoted would be only too willing to cough up, in as much as they have been promoted by cheating it would be unfair on the rest. However would make more sense rather than hit them financially, if they lose the right to play in the Premiership, would be fairer for those that abide by the rules then! |  | |
SheffieldBlue1 added 21:05 - May 7
He may claim that clubs are taking big risks, but what about the risks of being too prudent? If you look at the clubs who have gone down into league 1 recently, all have tried to just implement stability within there clubs through a lack of ambition driven by financial stability, and if you now look at Coventry, Preston etc they find themselves in a situation that i do not want Ipswich to find themselves in. Yes financial stability is a warranted objective, but not at the risk of the clubs league safety and ambition. |  | |
KenDubZ added 22:31 - May 7
Okay league 1 player... Jordan Rhodes!!! Sorted!!! |  | |
PunchNoHopers added 22:59 - May 7
Danny Haynes already and my guess either Jordan Rhodes or Dean Bowditch will all be Championship players next season with their current clubs then we can say told you so! |  | |
adamisablue added 00:44 - May 8
Will someone please explain the reasons for relegated clubs getting rewarded for being rubbish and getting parachute payments? I've no business/economic brain, so keep it simple please. basicly it was meant to sofeten the blow of losing loss of revenue/increased expenditure (in other words, loss of tv money and increase of wage contratcs etc) if i was a consporicy threoist, id say that the new rules are in place to keep every team exactly where they are. for a start, where is the premier f f p rules to stop chelsea/man city etc? why did they want to scrap promotion and relegation from the prem? (overwhlemlinginy rejected) lower league clubs forced into accepting that certain youths could go to cat 1 (prem basicly) for next to free? but im not, so ill let you make up ur own mind... |  | |
You need to login in order to post your comments
|
Blogs 297 bloggersIpswich Town Polls |