By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Signalling training up on the North Norfolk Railway
Just the two trains in operation on Saturday, so probably a lot of time spent sitting and chatting with my mentor, drinking coffee, and doing crosswords.
Currently six episodes in and at a complete loss as to how they're going to resolve the multiple threads over the next two hours.
It's strange watching it, having played the games. It feels very weird spotting all the little bits and pieces that you'd ordinarily consider to be easter eggs, and then realising that it's just as a result of them having stuck so faithfully to the source material.
But, at the same time, News Corp maintains its position of not having been found guilty in any of these cases. Exactly the same principle as Prince Nonce paying off Victoria Giuffre. There's nothing on official record stating that they did what they're alleged to have done.
Regardless of the team, definitely have the players hold off. Probably have them hold off once the game is out of sight at 5/6-0 or suchlike.
There's a massive difference between running up the score against senior pros, and running up the score against a young kid (potentially) making their debut.
Was chatting about this at the weekend with a mate who supports Barnet.
It does seem a very Paul Cook state of affairs - "you've got the job done, lads. Just go out and have some fun in the remaining games, you've earned it."
Can't imagine a KMc team doing anything like that in similar circumstances.
You're probably not far wrong about the tobacco industry.
The number of disingenuous adverts I’ve seen on social media, trying to argue that the ban will stop 50-year-old Gary from exercising his freedom of choice suggests that they’re pumping millions into opposing any sort of legislation.
Do safety certificates not come into play as well?
With Suffolk Constabulary forming part of the Safety Advisory Group, could they potentially refuse to issue a safety certificate for the match if they feel that the club is not listening to their advice on safety matters?
Looks like flammable cladding to me and, assuming that Croft has probably invested a chunk of his career earnings into a property portfolio, he probably won't qualify for help with the remediation costs (Qualifying Leaseholders must either have the property as their principal residence, or own no more than three dwellings in the UK). I'm not sure whether an incoming buyer would benefit from the BSA protections if the vendor doesn't benefit.
Believed to be freehold, awaiting solicitors' formal confirmation. All interested parties are advised to make their own enquiries."
Generally this is estate agent speak for 'we know it's leasehold and, if we gave you full details of the lease length, ground rent, and service charge, you'd run a f**king mile. Best to wait for you to instruct solicitors and start spending money on the place before you get the bad news.
That's my concern entirely. This strikes me as a bit of a Daryl Murphy season for him in the context of his previous performance.
No indication that he will replicate this season at Championship level, and even less indication that he'll be a significant asset in a higher league.
That said, I appreciate that the Town setup looks at things very differently. If the club want him and were able to obtain him on reasonable terms, I'd certainly trust their judgement.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
