| Celina 11:11 - Jul 22 with 1628 views | kiwiblue |
Rumoured to be sold to Swansea for 4 m squid.....thoughts? |  | | |  |
| Celina on 11:14 - Jul 22 with 1615 views | Superblue95 |
If he lives up to what he's capable of on a consistent basis then that's a steal for Swansea |  |
| |
| Celina on 11:17 - Jul 22 with 1597 views | christiand |
That price is inflated even in today's transfer market. Did he do enough to justify a price tag like that based on last season? For me, no. The jury is very much out on him. He has undoubted ability, but failed to show it enough and I'd also question his attitude. Having said that, MM's Ipswich didn't really allow Celina's talents to flourish, where perhaps Swansea's style of play would be more inviting. £2m would've been about right for me, he's still got plenty to prove. [Post edited 22 Jul 2018 12:21]
|  |
| |
| Celina on 11:20 - Jul 22 with 1577 views | kiwiblue |
| Celina on 11:17 - Jul 22 by christiand |
That price is inflated even in today's transfer market. Did he do enough to justify a price tag like that based on last season? For me, no. The jury is very much out on him. He has undoubted ability, but failed to show it enough and I'd also question his attitude. Having said that, MM's Ipswich didn't really allow Celina's talents to flourish, where perhaps Swansea's style of play would be more inviting. £2m would've been about right for me, he's still got plenty to prove. [Post edited 22 Jul 2018 12:21]
|
So should we be bidding?
Wages may be a bit high but could he play in the gap left by waghorn alongside Sears? | | | |
| Celina on 11:22 - Jul 22 with 1566 views | strikalite |
| Celina on 11:17 - Jul 22 by christiand |
That price is inflated even in today's transfer market. Did he do enough to justify a price tag like that based on last season? For me, no. The jury is very much out on him. He has undoubted ability, but failed to show it enough and I'd also question his attitude. Having said that, MM's Ipswich didn't really allow Celina's talents to flourish, where perhaps Swansea's style of play would be more inviting. £2m would've been about right for me, he's still got plenty to prove. [Post edited 22 Jul 2018 12:21]
|
With their parachute payments I'd say £4m isn't a bad price, experience of the Championship and we know he has ability....you really don't get much for £2m these days.. |  | | |
| Celina on 11:23 - Jul 22 with 1555 views | Currie10 |
| Celina on 11:17 - Jul 22 by christiand |
That price is inflated even in today's transfer market. Did he do enough to justify a price tag like that based on last season? For me, no. The jury is very much out on him. He has undoubted ability, but failed to show it enough and I'd also question his attitude. Having said that, MM's Ipswich didn't really allow Celina's talents to flourish, where perhaps Swansea's style of play would be more inviting. £2m would've been about right for me, he's still got plenty to prove. [Post edited 22 Jul 2018 12:21]
|
Think the opposite, great deal for Swansea that.
Will only get better and more likely to be able to simply attack / play better than for us.
Easy resale after a year for 6-8 mill minimum |  | | |
| Celina on 11:23 - Jul 22 with 1551 views | christiand |
| Celina on 11:22 - Jul 22 by strikalite |
With their parachute payments I'd say £4m isn't a bad price, experience of the Championship and we know he has ability....you really don't get much for £2m these days.. |
If he's worth £4m, then we should be demanding at least £10m for Waghorn! | |
| |
| Celina on 11:26 - Jul 22 with 1537 views | jonbull88 |
| Celina on 11:14 - Jul 22 by Superblue95 |
If he lives up to what he's capable of on a consistent basis then that's a steal for Swansea |
Is it though? I am of the understanding City have a buy back and a sell on clause in the potential deal. So if he does well they can get him back for a vastly reduced fee or if they don’t want him a fair % of any fee. It’s basically a glorified loan imo. | | | |
| Celina on 11:33 - Jul 22 with 1506 views | Keno |
It is called Swansea cos there're swans in the sea? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Celina on 11:41 - Jul 22 with 1478 views | jas0999 |
Not really played enough by MM. Fee probably realistic in today’s market, but certainly wouldn’t want to see us pay £4M for him. | | | |
| Celina on 11:44 - Jul 22 with 1459 views | strikalite |
| Celina on 11:23 - Jul 22 by christiand |
If he's worth £4m, then we should be demanding at least £10m for Waghorn! |
If we were selling to an Ex Prem Club then we probably would be, for what it's worth I think in today's market for a guy who is bang in form I think we should be demanding well over £6m, I see Posh are still demanding £6.5m for Marriott, they haven't simply cashed in, we should be doing this too no doubt imo..
£8m for me :) | | | |
| Celina on 12:19 - Jul 22 with 1396 views | Wickets |
About right for me , he was pretty good in the odd game that we decided to play on the front foot but pretty poor on the days that we just went out and defended so with the right manager and in a balanced team he will be a good assett me thinks. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
