| Why would you want a 66% effective vaccine when an 89% one exists? 14:14 - Jan 29 with 399 views | BLUEBEAT |
Better than nothing, obviously, but you’d always be wondering.... |  |
| |  |
| Why would you want a 66% effective vaccine when an 89% one exists? on 14:15 - Jan 29 with 388 views | StokieBlue |
It's only one shot though which is better in some locations where logistics are difficult.
We must try not to frame everything from the worldview of ourselves.
SB |  |
| |
| Why would you want a 66% effective vaccine when an 89% one exists? on 14:16 - Jan 29 with 390 views | hype313 |
This is the Key
|  |
| |
| Why would you want a 66% effective vaccine when an 89% one exists? on 14:16 - Jan 29 with 383 views | homer_123 |
Options - better to have lots of potential vaccines than just one.
Supply maybe better - might be cheaper and easier to roll out etc etc |  |
| |
| Why would you want a 66% effective vaccine when an 89% one exists? on 14:16 - Jan 29 with 376 views | BLUEBEAT |
| Why would you want a 66% effective vaccine when an 89% one exists? on 14:16 - Jan 29 by hype313 |
This is the Key
|
OK
Thanks for link | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
