| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse 00:03 - Apr 11 with 1233 views | pistonbroke |
Cook is nothing without Richardson , clough was nothing without Taylor
Cook somehow has managed to make lambert look good , I predict cook will be gone by Xmas , these new people won’t hang about , they want success
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | | |  |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:17 - Apr 11 with 1164 views | WicklowBlue |
We are all the sum of our parts! No manager is successful without a team behind them. To quote multiple others you can't polish a turd. Our squad is bloated and imbalanced...
Several players need to be let go, but equally add some fire power up front and some grit in midfield and we'll get out of this league. |  | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:29 - Apr 11 with 1140 views | pistonbroke |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:17 - Apr 11 by WicklowBlue |
We are all the sum of our parts! No manager is successful without a team behind them. To quote multiple others you can't polish a turd. Our squad is bloated and imbalanced...
Several players need to be let go, but equally add some fire power up front and some grit in midfield and we'll get out of this league. |
Not with cook in charge we won’t | | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:31 - Apr 11 with 1136 views | WicklowBlue |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:29 - Apr 11 by pistonbroke |
Not with cook in charge we won’t |
Care to expand on your thinking? | | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:33 - Apr 11 with 1131 views | wkj |
I have a feeling that KD may well become Cook's #1 |  |
| |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:35 - Apr 11 with 1130 views | pistonbroke |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:31 - Apr 11 by WicklowBlue |
Care to expand on your thinking? |
Yeah no worries , even lambert got more out of this sh it’e show than cook has , under cook somehow our performances have been worse | | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:37 - Apr 11 with 1122 views | wkj |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:35 - Apr 11 by pistonbroke |
Yeah no worries , even lambert got more out of this sh it’e show than cook has , under cook somehow our performances have been worse |
Keep in mind there are probably a fair few of our players who no know they wont get contracts next season, that wasn't the case under Lambert - or rather - not an immediate consideration | |
| |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:39 - Apr 11 with 1109 views | pistonbroke |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:37 - Apr 11 by wkj |
Keep in mind there are probably a fair few of our players who no know they wont get contracts next season, that wasn't the case under Lambert - or rather - not an immediate consideration |
So that’s an excuse for inept performances is it , what has cook shown , what game changing tactical decisions has he made , I’ll tell you none | | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:43 - Apr 11 with 1096 views | wkj |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:39 - Apr 11 by pistonbroke |
So that’s an excuse for inept performances is it , what has cook shown , what game changing tactical decisions has he made , I’ll tell you none |
No excuse, but Cook has a lot more to be judged on, Primarily, what is a cook team? Right now these players are not playing for new contracts- it is clear.
I am not saying cook is the Messiah, but he's not the main problem now either. The main issues is well and truly with the players, of whom, many have clocked out for the season.
You can rest assured though come the first game of next season, the honeymoon period will be well and truly over- and all eyes will be on cook. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:46 - Apr 11 with 1090 views | WicklowBlue |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:35 - Apr 11 by pistonbroke |
Yeah no worries , even lambert got more out of this sh it’e show than cook has , under cook somehow our performances have been worse |
Cheers, I hear what you are saying but really did Lambo get more out of this complete sh8t show? This has been the ongoing conversation all night on here....
I'm not seeing any difference between both managers at all. You can cite Gill's 3 wins but honestly we have a massive rebuilding project ahead of us. At some stage we need to realise that it's not the owner or manager causing the problem....it's down to the players. (Along with really poor recruitment over the past while) | | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:46 - Apr 11 with 1091 views | pistonbroke |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 00:43 - Apr 11 by wkj |
No excuse, but Cook has a lot more to be judged on, Primarily, what is a cook team? Right now these players are not playing for new contracts- it is clear.
I am not saying cook is the Messiah, but he's not the main problem now either. The main issues is well and truly with the players, of whom, many have clocked out for the season.
You can rest assured though come the first game of next season, the honeymoon period will be well and truly over- and all eyes will be on cook. |
That’s fair comment , but for us to be worse than when lambert went to me is criminal , anyway I will put it out here now , cook will be gone by Xmas | | | |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 08:48 - Apr 11 with 808 views | Wacko |
Are you seriously suggesting that once a manager finds an assistant, that's it, they're paired for life like mallards in a pond? That Cook, who has managed different clubs and recruited new players he's never worked with before to fit his style of play, can't also recruit an assistant manager he's never worked with before to fit his style of play? | |
| |
| PHIL!!!! on 08:49 - Apr 11 with 802 views | factual_blue |
And another for the football section. |  |
| |
| Lambert was nothing without culverhouse on 08:55 - Apr 11 with 765 views | Durovigutum |
And yet Alex Ferguson had multiple assistant managers finding success with each, and Sir Bob did the same across many team in any countries and again found success everywhere.
Perhaps it is about the manager, and of course the players? |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
