| The old badge on 21:06 - Apr 18 with 1651 views | jeera |
Dunno, the one Beattie's wearing there looks more in keeping of the horse's shape than the small [Wiki] version. I.e. its back is deeper whereas the Wiki one its back has a shallower curve.
Apart from the ball the top one looks the closest resemblance.
If anything they both look like slight variants from the one on Beattie's shirt. |  |
|  |
| The old badge on 21:09 - Apr 18 with 1627 views | GlasgowBlue |
The top one is wrong. |  |
| |
| The old badge on 21:11 - Apr 18 with 1629 views | Bluespeed225 |
I’ve got two math worn shirts from that era, and they are both the Beattie badge. As an aside, the badges and Adidas logos are slightly ‘imperfect’ on match worn shirts as opposed to replica mass produced ones. Indented to the left, and wording slightly askew. |  | | |
| The old badge on 21:43 - Apr 18 with 1546 views | BryanPlug |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
| |
| The old badge on 22:04 - Apr 18 with 1501 views | PremierBlue |
Imagine that man walking into tomorrows training session and showing a little mental attitude. What a shocking contrast! |  | | |
| The old badge on 22:25 - Apr 18 with 1459 views | jeera |
| The old badge on 21:43 - Apr 18 by BryanPlug |
[content removed at owner's request] |
It's not right is it?
Too elongated and as you say without any definition.
The one above though has defined mouth features which the shirt badge doesn't appear to.
As I say, neither match the shirt. | |
| |
| The old badge on 22:49 - Apr 18 with 1396 views | FoD_Blue |
The letter 'C' on both of the badges looks wrong. The top one seems to be cut short on the right hand side and the bottom one looks to be too closed compared to the one on Beattie's shirt. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The old badge on 23:06 - Apr 18 with 1361 views | NthQldITFC |
In these days of precise vector artwork (shapes defined mathematically and precisely irrespective of size) we can expect a perfect match and digital sharing of precise images, but I suspect things were a little more ad hoc in those days (by necessity perhaps) and different manufacturers and image producers had to create their own version for their own processes and equipment. So there are probably a lot of different versions about, many of which were officially approved. |  |
| |
| The old badge on 23:10 - Apr 18 with 1341 views | jeera |
| The old badge on 23:06 - Apr 18 by NthQldITFC |
In these days of precise vector artwork (shapes defined mathematically and precisely irrespective of size) we can expect a perfect match and digital sharing of precise images, but I suspect things were a little more ad hoc in those days (by necessity perhaps) and different manufacturers and image producers had to create their own version for their own processes and equipment. So there are probably a lot of different versions about, many of which were officially approved. |
Ooh, get you and Clapham with your evidence and sensible answers. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
