Forum | Davis or Humphreys by MillsTash

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Davis or Humphreys 21:32 - Jan 7 with 1051 views

MillsTash

You can only keep 1 as a club comes in. Whose more valuable to the club?

Davis or Humphreys on 21:48 - Jan 7 with 959 views

Ipswich_Jack97

Has to be Davis all day long… so vital to the way the team will play hopefully for years to come.

Humphrey’s whilst being an exciting talent, will Not be the reason we’re (fingers crossed) promoted this season.

Poll:

Singing to be announced first

Davis or Humphreys on 22:06 - Jan 7 with 868 views

Nthsuffolkblue

It depends how value is measured. It is also important to remember that no player is irreplaceable and a fair proportion of players never fulfil their early potential.

I would expect a higher up-front fee for Davis and higher potential add-ons for Humphreys.

At the current time, we could manage better without Humphreys than we could without Davis. It would be good to see both stay and develop and grow with us as we progress as a club.

I am also sure the club will be thorough in replacing and maintaining a balanced squad when the time does come too.

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Davis or Humphreys on 22:07 - Jan 7 with 870 views

SomethingBlue

Davis - he’s a unique talent for his position at this level and probably the one above. Humphreys is going to have a top-level career but you can usually find someone who’ll run a midfield (even if the years between Magilton and Morsy suggest otherwise).

Blog:

The Way Back From Here Will Be Long, But There is a Way

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread