Listening to Mckenna 15:05 - Jan 23 with 3146 views | Bobsthename | Prematch interview looks like no new defender he must think we have enough and i for one will blame him if we keep conceding soft goals and fail to win the play offs because fans and pundits can see we appear to be very fragile at the back lately. |  | | |  |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:40 - Jan 23 with 647 views | positivity |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:14 - Jan 23 by FrimleyBlue | Think you've gone a bit to strong. We have signed a new fullback. But does that answer our problems at the back? We don't seem to want to use Edmundson.. Keough hasn't looked comfortable in any game he's played and Burgess is getting stick every week. So tbf you have a point. Bit strong within the OP so perhaps that's why people have gone a bit angry.. but if People are disagreeing about not getting a new cb.. I find it quite surprising as we don't seem to have a CB that the majority on here are happy with and who's available. |
you're being far too kind to the op, and going far too strong on the problem. the fact is that in 2022, ipswich let in less goals than pretty much anyone (36 cf sheff weds 42, cf plymouth 48), that was done with a defensive line-up including woolf/burgess/edmundson/donacien. that suggests that the temporary problems with mistakes are unlikely to be terminal, though edmundson's niggles haven't helped we have an excellent defensive line-up for league one and we've further enhanced it with the addition of clarke. bleating on petulantly about wanting more new toys as bob is, is pretty ridiculous! |  |
|  |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:53 - Jan 23 with 614 views | FrimleyBlue |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:40 - Jan 23 by positivity | you're being far too kind to the op, and going far too strong on the problem. the fact is that in 2022, ipswich let in less goals than pretty much anyone (36 cf sheff weds 42, cf plymouth 48), that was done with a defensive line-up including woolf/burgess/edmundson/donacien. that suggests that the temporary problems with mistakes are unlikely to be terminal, though edmundson's niggles haven't helped we have an excellent defensive line-up for league one and we've further enhanced it with the addition of clarke. bleating on petulantly about wanting more new toys as bob is, is pretty ridiculous! |
I'm caught on the cb situ tbh. Burgess I like as he really helps us in the air. But he's been shown up terribly when people run at him Edmundson... in out in out.. what is actually going on there And keogh.. well he's just never looked good enough which has been strange considering he was playing league above with ease. No it's not problematic in the volume of goals conceded but it just seems to every week struggle. Is a new RB going to suddenly change it? That's my only concern But we will see. We can only wait and see. |  |
|  |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:54 - Jan 23 with 611 views | Bobsthename |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:09 - Jan 23 by positivity | i care i also don't think you can moan about the lack of defenders, when we've just spent a million on a defender! give him a chance to see what difference he can make before droning and moaning on typical plastic fan who wants to solve everything with money rather than coaching and getting behind the team. |
cough cough your twisting what i have said i’m sure Clarke will be good but we could do with better cover than Keogh but you seem to rate him going by what your saying i’m saying having one centre back as cover is not good enough . |  | |  |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:02 - Jan 23 with 600 views | positivity |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:54 - Jan 23 by Bobsthename | cough cough your twisting what i have said i’m sure Clarke will be good but we could do with better cover than Keogh but you seem to rate him going by what your saying i’m saying having one centre back as cover is not good enough . |
utter nonsense, clarke coming in means keogh is no longer our first cover, the defence is already improved on a unit which was the best in the league in 2022. keogh'll fall further back in the pecking order when edmundson's back. stop throwing your toys out of the pram just because of a few short-term problems! one more thing, and i'm asking politely here, please learn to use punctuation; people might be able to understand your points better if you use it properly. |  |
|  |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:05 - Jan 23 with 592 views | Bobsthename |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:02 - Jan 23 by positivity | utter nonsense, clarke coming in means keogh is no longer our first cover, the defence is already improved on a unit which was the best in the league in 2022. keogh'll fall further back in the pecking order when edmundson's back. stop throwing your toys out of the pram just because of a few short-term problems! one more thing, and i'm asking politely here, please learn to use punctuation; people might be able to understand your points better if you use it properly. |
Disagree but hey ho,also it’s a message board not exam don’t read my posts if you don’t understand you obviously like to dig at people just move on boy. |  | |  |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:23 - Jan 23 with 568 views | positivity |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:05 - Jan 23 by Bobsthename | Disagree but hey ho,also it’s a message board not exam don’t read my posts if you don’t understand you obviously like to dig at people just move on boy. |
a comma and a full stop! i'm honoured! keep improving, but try supporting the football club rather than demanding new toys all the time |  |
|  |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:30 - Jan 23 with 559 views | Bobsthename |
Listening to Mckenna on 19:23 - Jan 23 by positivity | a comma and a full stop! i'm honoured! keep improving, but try supporting the football club rather than demanding new toys all the time |
I do support the team but on here we are allowed to put what we think into words i’m not shy of saying what i think is wrong and surely that’s what this forum is for rather than just telling someone off for not doing grammar correctly. |  | |  |
Listening to Mckenna on 22:48 - Jan 23 with 516 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Listening to Mckenna on 18:54 - Jan 23 by Bobsthename | cough cough your twisting what i have said i’m sure Clarke will be good but we could do with better cover than Keogh but you seem to rate him going by what your saying i’m saying having one centre back as cover is not good enough . |
Which one CB is our cover? We have Donacien, Woolfenden, Burgess. We then have Edmundson, Clarke and Keogh. Which one of those 6 is the one cover and why are you expecting us to play all of the other 5? Even if Keogh is not good enough to ever pull a Town shirt on again, we would still have 2 CBs as cover. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Listening to Mckenna on 22:53 - Jan 23 with 511 views | Bobsthename |
Listening to Mckenna on 22:48 - Jan 23 by Nthsuffolkblue | Which one CB is our cover? We have Donacien, Woolfenden, Burgess. We then have Edmundson, Clarke and Keogh. Which one of those 6 is the one cover and why are you expecting us to play all of the other 5? Even if Keogh is not good enough to ever pull a Town shirt on again, we would still have 2 CBs as cover. |
Donacian is pretty much out of form and Burgess the same Wolfie at times is over confident and gets out muscled Edmundson is good and Clarke looks to be good a couple of injuries struggling well we are now with no injuries so strength is the key. |  | |  |
Listening to Mckenna on 22:58 - Jan 23 with 503 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Listening to Mckenna on 22:53 - Jan 23 by Bobsthename | Donacian is pretty much out of form and Burgess the same Wolfie at times is over confident and gets out muscled Edmundson is good and Clarke looks to be good a couple of injuries struggling well we are now with no injuries so strength is the key. |
Which one of those 6 is the 1 CB cover? Are you saying Donacien and Burgess should never play again? So Keogh is your only cover? I know you don't like criticism of your grammar but it makes it very difficult to understand what you are actually saying. |  |
|  |
| |