Forum | The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper by SheffordBlue

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper 09:54 - Jun 11 with 1877 views

An interesting article here on how EFL clubs are gaming the emergency loan goalkeeper rules.

If Hladky were to leave in the summer this situation could apply to us with Nick Hayes not currently meeting the criteria for 'professional goalkeeper'.

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/the-loophole-clubs-are-using-to-create-fake

Poll:

How many points do you think you'll need to get a ticket for Norwich?

The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper on 12:28 - Jun 11 with 1539 views

Illinoisblue

Not immediately clear of the logic here:

“The clause is actually designed, in theory, to protect inexperienced young goalkeepers from being thrown in the deep end in the EFL”

If they never get a chance to gain experience they’ll always be inexperienced.

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper on 12:34 - Jun 11 with 1518 views

Trequartista

The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper on 12:28 - Jun 11 by Illinoisblue
Not immediately clear of the logic here: “The clause is actually designed, in theory, to protect inexperienced young goalkeepers from being thrown in the deep end in the EFL” If they never get a chance to gain experience they’ll always be inexperienced.

It's pretty much nonsense isn't it. Simply change the rule back to a professional goalkeeper being a goalkeeper who is a professional and problem solved.

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper on 15:24 - Jun 11 with 1206 views

monty_radio

The Rise of the 'Fake' No 2 Goalkeeper on 12:34 - Jun 11 by Trequartista
It's pretty much nonsense isn't it. Simply change the rule back to a professional goalkeeper being a goalkeeper who is a professional and problem solved.

That any business might exploit a legal loophole is embedded in the law of unintended consequence. But the E.F.L. surely have a duty of care that means they ought to look into this very carefully.

Blog:

Too Many Suspects? â€“ A Swede Ramble

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread