| No subject 12:18 - Sep 13 with 754 views | AYACCA |
[Post edited 13 Sep 2023 12:50]
|  | | |  |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:34 - Sep 13 with 686 views | Steve_M |
That's not even close to Burley's best 90s team. |  |
| |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:36 - Sep 13 with 678 views | BlueBadger |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:34 - Sep 13 by Steve_M |
That's not even close to Burley's best 90s team. |
Weird selections all round. Even the inclusion of Murphy, given that his best stint with us was post 2010. |  |
| |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:39 - Sep 13 with 661 views | AYACCA |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:34 - Sep 13 by Steve_M |
That's not even close to Burley's best 90s team. |
Im going for random players from those eras. | | | |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:39 - Sep 13 with 659 views | J4ck22 |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:36 - Sep 13 by BlueBadger |
Weird selections all round. Even the inclusion of Murphy, given that his best stint with us was post 2010. |
Plus McGoldrick wasn't with us... Unless he's including 2010s, but that would also be weird. |  | | |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:46 - Sep 13 with 614 views | gainsboroughblue |
A better, and less complicated, match up would be 1992 v 2000 promotion sides. |  |
| |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:53 - Sep 13 with 562 views | burnbudgiesburn |
| Just for fun, who would win? on 12:46 - Sep 13 by gainsboroughblue |
A better, and less complicated, match up would be 1992 v 2000 promotion sides. |
Yep.
1992 was a great 'team' of decent players that achieved more than 2000 by actually winning the title.
But the 2000 team technically was far superior and a better passing side and much better equipped for top flight football despite the fact it had 1 year less in the Prem. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
