| How is that not a penalty? 15:46 - Aug 24 with 4271 views | DanTheMan |
Genuine question? Smacked into and doesn't get the ball. |  |
| |  |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:11 - Aug 24 with 640 views | gringoblue |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:08 - Aug 24 by NthQldITFC |
Yeah, I've fully changed my mind watching it again - sandwiched and still favourite to get to the ball at that point. Pen. |
Delaney and Cunningham on on premier also agree it was a clear penalty. Savinho takes Davis out at the hip, nothing to do with Davis dangling a leg. |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:11 - Aug 24 with 623 views | ronnyd |
| How is that not a penalty? on 15:48 - Aug 24 by ArchiRob |
Looked same contact as Lief's but deeper but looks like VA R is only for top teams
disapointing |
Yes, there are two 'p's in disappointing.  |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:12 - Aug 24 with 609 views | DanTheMan |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:07 - Aug 24 by Vegtablue |
VAR reviewed it while City were attacking and ruled no foul, or at least that's what my commentary team said. |
I'd love to know why that's not a foul, it's cliche but anywhere else on the pitch and that's a standard foul for me. | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:15 - Aug 24 with 557 views | forrestsfringe |
For what it’s worth, Paul Merson didn’t think it was a penalty. | | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:16 - Aug 24 with 552 views | billlm |
How is ours not |  | | |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:16 - Aug 24 with 546 views | pointofblue |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:15 - Aug 24 by forrestsfringe |
For what it’s worth, Paul Merson didn’t think it was a penalty. |
Keown called the decision a 'joke' and said it was clearly so. | |
| |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:28 - Aug 24 with 452 views | Vegtablue |
| How is that not a penalty? on 16:12 - Aug 24 by DanTheMan |
I'd love to know why that's not a foul, it's cliche but anywhere else on the pitch and that's a standard foul for me. |
Yeah me too, whether they've glossed over a 'coming together' in favour of deciding City were always recovering possession, or if they decided Savinho's(?) use of his body was legitimate. Likely we'll never find out. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
