| Ref Watch on Sky 08:21 - Aug 26 with 2460 views | Wickets |
At 11am today doubt they will even mentionittle Ipswich's penalty claim ?? Those who know how to message Sky could demand coverage I suppose . |  | | |  |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 09:17 - Aug 26 with 2299 views | BlueNomad |
PL Rule: Ensure the Big Clubs get all the decisions. |  | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 10:10 - Aug 26 with 2096 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
I can't think of a more boring program to watch, ever. |  |
| |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:15 - Aug 26 with 1884 views | Wickets |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 10:10 - Aug 26 by Marshalls_Mullet |
I can't think of a more boring program to watch, ever. |
Good for you x | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:43 - Aug 26 with 1742 views | jackp_1878 |
i’m watching it now sky pundits are saying they don’t know how it hasn’t even gone to var because it’s a ‘clear and obvious’ error |  | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:44 - Aug 26 with 1740 views | Wickets |
Interesting Ref watch say Town should have had a penalty "its a shocker " | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:44 - Aug 26 with 1724 views | Len_Brennan |
Clear as day, Gallagher couldn't argue against it. | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:50 - Aug 26 with 1667 views | JamestownPrince |
VAR ref was David Coote who also refereed the Bournemouth game yesterday...
I know Coote from the East Midlands and not Norfolk, but wonder if he is related the the ex Naaridge player Adrian Coote? | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:53 - Aug 26 with 1614 views | whymark4lazio0 |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:44 - Aug 26 by Len_Brennan |
Clear as day, Gallagher couldn't argue against it. |
Shocking that he just sat there and smiled. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Ref Watch on Sky on 12:00 - Aug 26 with 1534 views | forrestsfringe |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 11:44 - Aug 26 by Len_Brennan |
Clear as day, Gallagher couldn't argue against it. |
Do we think PGMOL might be sending Kieran a letter of apology? | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 12:16 - Aug 26 with 1351 views | Simonds92 |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 12:00 - Aug 26 by forrestsfringe |
Do we think PGMOL might be sending Kieran a letter of apology? |
I'd like to hear the audio from the VAR guys tbh. Although, how reliable that audio is I'm not sure. | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 12:18 - Aug 26 with 1332 views | Europablue |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 12:00 - Aug 26 by forrestsfringe |
Do we think PGMOL might be sending Kieran a letter of apology? |
They will probably send one to Farke, because they only seem to have his address. | | | |
| Ref Watch on Sky on 12:33 - Aug 26 with 1226 views | Len_Brennan |
It's hard to argue that we would have got a result only for VAR, but the first decision to give the penalty (correctly if we accept that an intervention was in order as per the guidelines) did have a massive impact on the game. It unsettled us after taking the lead; who knows how we might have done had we kept it at 0-1 for the next 10 minutes.
But it was given, & the 5 minute meltdown that followed left us in a desperate state, BUT we recovered, limited their attack³ (ok 2 shots off the woodwork, but they were misses) after that & started to play our back into it.
Then we had the second incident, again at a key time, just before the break. The ref got it wrong, VAR got it wrong & worse, VAR got it doubly wrong by not even asking the ref to look at it, as they did with the first incident. Wrong, inconsistent & particularly egregious given the earlier incident. Going in at 3-2, having gotten one back, would be a very different prospect, psychologically, than being 3-1 down where they took lashed in 3 goals in 5 minutes.
It should have been a consistent both given or both denied, but City benefiited massively from both & we were negatively affected by both.
I don't even want to consider what might have been had we gotten the benefit of both decisions, instead of City. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
