| Back 4 or 5? 00:22 - Nov 11 with 1188 views | BrockleyBlue78 |
MOTD had the formation as 5 at the back
Mick mills mentioned 5 at the back several times
Only noticed the usual 4 at the back during the game
What did anyone else see? |  | | |  |
| Back 4 or 5? on 00:42 - Nov 11 with 1113 views | ITFCMonk |
I think the idea of the system is to be a hybrid of the 2, so when Johnson pushes forward Tuanzebe comes across and the same on the other side if Davis pushes on, Johnson can tuck back in to form a 4 |  |
| |
| Back 4 or 5? on 08:14 - Nov 11 with 837 views | DJR |
I saw it as a back 5, with Johnson and Davies as wing backs. [Post edited 11 Nov 2024 8:15]
|  | | |
| Back 4 or 5? on 08:32 - Nov 11 with 773 views | MK1 |
Bit like we always play really, just a natural defender playing wide right. |  |
| |
| Back 4 or 5? on 09:17 - Nov 11 with 652 views | Simonds92 |
| Back 4 or 5? on 00:42 - Nov 11 by ITFCMonk |
I think the idea of the system is to be a hybrid of the 2, so when Johnson pushes forward Tuanzebe comes across and the same on the other side if Davis pushes on, Johnson can tuck back in to form a 4 |
Think this is spot on to be honest, it wasn't a 5 but the 2 on the right did interchange at different points in the game. I've got to say, I wrote Johnson off in my head after watching him play Fortuna and he proceeded to continue that level of performance for the first 9 games this season but the last 2 games he's really impressed me and l9oks like the player we thought we were signing and Axel has gone up another level this season too. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
