Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Lot of comments here saying that Forest were poor 17:36 - Nov 30 with 938 viewsDubtractor

With the implication being that we should have done better.

That would be Forest who are1 point off second, with the 3rd best defence in the division, and who seem to thrive on making the game ugly? A team of big lads who we couldn't compete with physically.

Forest did exactly what they needed to do, horrible team, and ugly to watch, but to suggest they are/were poor is just a really odd take.

I'm not saying we were good, as we evidently struggled second half, but perhaps some should consider that was because Forest stopped us from playing.

I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll: Important Christmas poll - which is the best Celebration chocolate?

5
Lot of comments here saying that Forest were poor on 17:55 - Nov 30 with 795 viewsArmaghBlue

They will tumble down the table like Preston did last year after their strong start.
0
Lot of comments here saying that Forest were poor on 17:57 - Nov 30 with 781 viewsnorthants

Only from people thst don't understand football. Forest were not poor at all.
We did well to stay in the game....away at a top half side.
0
Lot of comments here saying that Forest were poor on 17:58 - Nov 30 with 771 viewspointofblue

I have to disagree in terms of the second half. First half we were decent, but the second 45... and I would say Forest did nothing special in the second half compared to the first. They kept at their level, whilst we took a visible step back.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0
Lot of comments here saying that Forest were poor on 18:01 - Nov 30 with 742 viewsvictorysquad

They were. V good defensively

Diving cheats though, had ref in their back pocket

Poll: If we sing for 90 mins for all remaining games, how many points is it worth?

2
Lot of comments here saying that Forest were poor on 18:01 - Nov 30 with 737 viewsLankHenners

It's a classic football fan thing to deride a victorious opposition as rubbish when they play a more 'rugged' style than other teams. Presumably it's to somehow cheapen their win and suggest your team therefore come away with some sort of moral victory or to go in harder on your own players for not getting something from the match.

As you say they just did what they wanted to do well and stopped us from being able to impose ourselves on the game with any consistent threat.

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand.
Poll: What is Celina's problem?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025