Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Value for money 09:44 - Jan 1 with 1706 viewsflykickingbybgunn

Town have the 3rd lowest points/cost ratio in the PL.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2024/12/31/man-utd-pound-for-pound-worst-te

For instance the Chelsea squad cost £1048m and they have 35 points meaning each point could be said to have cost them £30m ish

Man Utd cost £862m and they have 22 points giving each a cost of £39m.

Town cost £138m and have 15 points costing £9m each
0
Value for money on 09:52 - Jan 1 with 1622 viewsMK1

Norwich are a league below. That will do for me.

Poll: New hobby suggestions for NeedhamChris.

0
Value for money on 09:52 - Jan 1 with 1613 viewsbobbyramsey

Interesting take, I can't read it but who was below us?
0
Value for money on 10:31 - Jan 1 with 1426 viewsmonty_radio

Bit misleading as it seems to only count the squads from the start of current season. So, Fulham are above us. But that ignores their millions down the drain in the immediate preceding seasons.

Blog: Too Many Suspects? – A Swede Ramble

0
Value for money on 10:33 - Jan 1 with 1409 viewstrncbluearmy

Value for money on 09:52 - Jan 1 by bobbyramsey

Interesting take, I can't read it but who was below us?


Forest and Fulham
This link may work

https://telegraph.co.uk/gift/91e67eff34f4bded

Point made in the comments Ipswich also have the 2nd worst injury record

Confirms what we all know KMc is a football genius
1
Value for money on 12:31 - Jan 1 with 1045 viewsbobbyramsey

Value for money on 10:33 - Jan 1 by trncbluearmy

Forest and Fulham
This link may work

https://telegraph.co.uk/gift/91e67eff34f4bded

Point made in the comments Ipswich also have the 2nd worst injury record

Confirms what we all know KMc is a football genius


Thanks 👍
0
Value for money on 12:38 - Jan 1 with 1002 views_clive_baker_

Absolute nonsense statistic.
2
Value for money on 12:38 - Jan 1 with 1002 viewsredrickstuhaart

We spent 138m in the Summer? Really?

The figures they are using look very odd.
0
Value for money on 13:48 - Jan 1 with 842 viewsflykickingbybgunn

Value for money on 12:38 - Jan 1 by redrickstuhaart

We spent 138m in the Summer? Really?

The figures they are using look very odd.


I think they are taking in the cost of the whole squad, not just one year.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025