| Sainz and sinner 00:05 - Jan 11 with 2223 views | Bucklebury_blue |
Something seriously wrong at the FA when Budgie Sainz gets 6 game ban and £12k fine for spitting at Mepham but Cunha gets a 3 match ban and £120k fine (2 weeks wages) for assaulting one of our security team, reduced to 2 games and £80k because he offered to buy him a pair of glasses. |  | | |  |
| Sainz and sinner on 00:19 - Jan 11 with 1977 views | bournemouthblue |
The FA are surely in danger of setting a precedent for reducing a charge because he 'apologised'
He gave a misleading account of the incident also but they have just let that fly |  |
| |
| Sainz and sinner on 02:28 - Jan 11 with 1211 views | Cafe_Newman |
Then Sainz should learn from Cunha and offer to buy the other player a box of Kleenex and his punishment will be halved. |  | | |
| Sainz and sinner on 06:26 - Jan 11 with 1052 views | BrockleyBlue78 |
100% agree. How long did it take to teach a verdict on Sainz? |  | | |
| Sainz and sinner on 07:56 - Jan 11 with 902 views | bazza |
I’d rather have my glasses pulled off and a slap than being spat in the face, lowest of the low
Spitting at someone.. still Amazes me how Jamie carrager is still on tv after what he did . |  | | |
| Sainz and sinner on 08:45 - Jan 11 with 792 views | EastTownBlue |
Six matches is the standard suspension for spitting offences. Although 3 matches is standard for violent conduct which is what Cunha should have got (at the least). | | | |
| Sainz and sinner on 11:38 - Jan 11 with 540 views | bournemouthblue |
| Sainz and sinner on 08:45 - Jan 11 by EastTownBlue |
Six matches is the standard suspension for spitting offences. Although 3 matches is standard for violent conduct which is what Cunha should have got (at the least). |
The softening of the ban was compounded by one of those game being an FA Cup game
Wolves appealed the shortening further too and it was rejected, the absolute temerity of it | |
| |
| Sainz and sinner on 12:18 - Jan 11 with 473 views | HighgateBlue |
I really think that Cunha should have got 3 games rather than 2. Asking for more than that is total wishful thinking.
I shed no tears for someone who spits and gets a 6 game ban.
Can we please move on from this? |  | | |
| Sainz and sinner on 12:22 - Jan 11 with 444 views | MK1 |
I would say that spitting is a far more serious offence. Our security guy wasn't physically assaulted other than having his glasses removed. Cunha should have still got longer, but I still say spitting is the filthier of the crimes. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sainz and sinner on 12:27 - Jan 11 with 412 views | BrockleyBlue78 |
| Sainz and sinner on 12:22 - Jan 11 by MK1 |
I would say that spitting is a far more serious offence. Our security guy wasn't physically assaulted other than having his glasses removed. Cunha should have still got longer, but I still say spitting is the filthier of the crimes. |
Did you not see the bit when he was elbowed in the back of the head by Cunha?!?!
Spitting at someone is worse than being elbowed in the head?!? Wow. I firmly disagree with that. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
