Delap Buy Back Clause 18:03 - Jan 20 with 3806 views | trent_blue | Rumoured as 20mil a few months, now seems to be reported as 25-30mil. £30mil would make sense as it’s double what we originally payed, but puts us back to square one when city inevitable trigger it - if even to sell him to someone else for 40-50mil. Does anyone know if this actually exists? People seem to be quoting Delap as us selling for 60-70mil, but the reality is if this clause exists we won’t be getting anything more than £30mil - and a big hole to fill. |  | | |  |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:00 - Jan 20 with 473 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 18:05 - Jan 20 by Zx1988 | I'm sure that this was pretty roundly debunked a couple of months back - the understanding is that City have matching rights, rather than a buy-back clause. Does this really need going over again, every single time someone mentions Delap going back to City? |
No one knows either way. 100% speculation. |  |
|  |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:35 - Jan 20 with 391 views | lazyblue | No it doesn’t |  | |  |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:39 - Jan 20 with 383 views | Horsham |
Last sentence is the only certainty. Although I’d argue that if the buyback was £30m and City could do it at their leisure then it would have happened by now so city could flip him to someone else for a profit. |  | |  |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:43 - Jan 20 with 365 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:39 - Jan 20 by Horsham | Last sentence is the only certainty. Although I’d argue that if the buyback was £30m and City could do it at their leisure then it would have happened by now so city could flip him to someone else for a profit. |
Unlikely any buy back clause could be triggered so early. |  |
|  |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:49 - Jan 20 with 336 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Delap Buy Back Clause on 20:35 - Jan 20 by lazyblue | No it doesn’t |
🤣🤣🤣🤣 |  |
|  |
| |