Nunez transfer - context is needed 16:51 - Aug 28 with 1380 views | EdwardF | Fans of the Sh1tty are now spinning the narrative: ''ITFC have massively overpaid for an injury prone ... etc. etc, etc'' And yet they paid £7m for Jurasek, Forson cost somewhere near £5m, and Crnac near £10m. |  |
| |  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 16:53 - Aug 28 with 1300 views | FrimleyBlue | I don't know how a player who averages over 30 games and season is injury prone. |  |
|  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 16:56 - Aug 28 with 1223 views | Rimsy | They're bitter aren't they, marvellous |  |
|  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 16:57 - Aug 28 with 1168 views | _clive_baker_ | Defence mechanism after their initial bed wetting. Smacks of 'we didn't want him anyway'. Bless them. |  | |  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 16:58 - Aug 28 with 1135 views | Basuco | He would be in a similar role to Jens I think, so if they would share that midfield ball carrying role, high intensity with less minutes from both would reduce the pressure to play when not 100%. |  | |  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 17:05 - Aug 28 with 939 views | J2BLUE | As predicted last night they soon switched the narrative. Such a shame so many screenshots have been taken by various people. |  |
|  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 17:19 - Aug 28 with 734 views | Hugoagogo_Reborn | Remember when they paid around €10m for Dutch striker Ricky Van Wolfswinkel? The 1 goal wonder! 🤣 |  | |  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 17:25 - Aug 28 with 645 views | CopfordBlue | Absolutely no context is needed. It’s brilliant, that’s all we need to know. |  |
|  |
Nunez transfer - context is needed on 17:33 - Aug 28 with 563 views | catch74 | It was bad enough seeing Broadhead in a Wrexham shirt, imagine a picture of him in Norwich kit. This is going to sting, a few of them are surprisingly sensible enough to admit it too. |  |
|  |
| |