Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Phil - Are we still interested in James? 06:40 - Aug 29 with 1079 viewstheinbetweener

As an addition to Nunez, or was it a case of either / or?

Hopefully the former.
0
Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 06:42 - Aug 29 with 1056 viewsitfcserbia

And does James count towards the 25-men squad?

Semper fidelis!
Poll: Would you sack Paul Cook?

0
Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 06:52 - Aug 29 with 954 viewsBudapestByBlimp

C'mon Phil ...

1
Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 07:09 - Aug 29 with 770 viewsPique

Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 06:52 - Aug 29 by BudapestByBlimp

C'mon Phil ...



Oh sit down.
1
Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 07:13 - Aug 29 with 712 viewsParky

Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 06:42 - Aug 29 by itfcserbia

And does James count towards the 25-men squad?


No, he wouldn’t. I still think that even after Nunez, we need another in there, so we’ve got 3 players competing for each side of the pivot: Cajuste, Taylor, Humphreys for the left and Azor, Nunez and James for the right.
1
Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 07:13 - Aug 29 with 707 viewsReuser_is_God

Oh sit down

Evans out
Poll: Are Burgers the new Cheese?

1
Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 07:26 - Aug 29 with 516 viewsitfcserbia

Phil - Are we still interested in James? on 07:13 - Aug 29 by Parky

No, he wouldn’t. I still think that even after Nunez, we need another in there, so we’ve got 3 players competing for each side of the pivot: Cajuste, Taylor, Humphreys for the left and Azor, Nunez and James for the right.


Or Taylor can be allowed to be more forward like 8 or 10 in front of a double pivot

Semper fidelis!
Poll: Would you sack Paul Cook?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025