Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame 19:17 - Sep 3 with 456 views | Bluesky | immediately and recognised as a club legend. |  | | |  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:21 - Sep 3 with 317 views | SuffolkPunchFC | Too soon. Conor’s contribution will be measured by how it’s remembered in 10-20 years, which is probably a more realistic minimum for someone to be added to the hall of famed. Others from the past would surely be ahead of him for adding eg Martijn Reuser |  | |  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:24 - Sep 3 with 306 views | Swansea_Blue |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:21 - Sep 3 by SuffolkPunchFC | Too soon. Conor’s contribution will be measured by how it’s remembered in 10-20 years, which is probably a more realistic minimum for someone to be added to the hall of famed. Others from the past would surely be ahead of him for adding eg Martijn Reuser |
Reuser? A a cult hero for sure, but there’s no way he’s ahead of Conor in terms of overall contribution. |  |
|  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:25 - Sep 3 with 300 views | SuffolkPunchFC | Edit: double post deleted. [Post edited 3 Sep 21:35]
|  | |  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:47 - Sep 3 with 238 views | SuffolkPunchFC |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:24 - Sep 3 by Swansea_Blue | Reuser? A a cult hero for sure, but there’s no way he’s ahead of Conor in terms of overall contribution. |
That’s not the point. I’m not attempting to compare their contributions. Conor is fresh in people’s minds, and for many a player they experienced, whereas they won’t have experience of players from 10, 20 or more years ago. It’s about how the ‘reputation’ of a player endures through the years. Typically a hall of fame recognises those that endure the years. Not someone added during their time with the club, or soon after. And he’s still our player, out on loan. If the hall of fame was to work like that, what about Morsy? |  | |  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:52 - Sep 3 with 188 views | Swansea_Blue |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:47 - Sep 3 by SuffolkPunchFC | That’s not the point. I’m not attempting to compare their contributions. Conor is fresh in people’s minds, and for many a player they experienced, whereas they won’t have experience of players from 10, 20 or more years ago. It’s about how the ‘reputation’ of a player endures through the years. Typically a hall of fame recognises those that endure the years. Not someone added during their time with the club, or soon after. And he’s still our player, out on loan. If the hall of fame was to work like that, what about Morsy? |
Ok, fair enough. We’ll revisit in 20 years! I’ll be depressingly old by then |  |
|  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 21:53 - Sep 3 with 180 views | redrickstuhaart | The mere concept of this "hall of fame" and "inducting" people into it, is inane American nonsense and I hate it. Players are famous, well regarded, etc for all sorts of reasons, irrespective of stupid marketing based collections of names. Just saying. |  | |  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 22:18 - Sep 3 with 114 views | cressi | A club legend are players who took us to our finest hours like the 61/62 side Fa cup winners and the great uefa Cup winning side although a notable achievement going from league 1 to the Premiership last season was totally embarrassing. Thank you so very much appreciated but legend. |  | |  |
Conor Chaplin should be admitted to our hall of fame on 22:31 - Sep 3 with 71 views | Everydayblue | "Legend" is well over used these days.... Got to be lifting some silverware, break the clubs all time goals record or appearance record, for me... Love Chaplin, but he's a "fans favourite" and not a club legend in my eyes. |  | |  |
| |