| Kierans cost us 3 points there 21:46 - Nov 4 with 3793 views | BouncebackIpswich |
Game for the taking, insane decision to drop Nunez and Taylor for Cajuste and Akpom. Very, very frustrating. |  | | |  |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 08:32 - Nov 5 with 372 views | wkj |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 08:31 - Nov 5 by Churchman |
No he isn’t. He said why he was making changes. Basically a lot of games in a short space of time, he’s managing the squad. Nothing whatever to do with the opposition in this instance.
Would I have kept the same team? Yes. But then my application for the job was rejected in favour of McKenna. No idea why. |
They couldn't afford your TWTD release fee, we all know you've got a man on the inside that gets you good terms with Phil under the table [Post edited 5 Nov 8:33]
|  |
| |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 08:39 - Nov 5 with 328 views | Churchman |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 22:54 - Nov 4 by BouncebackIpswich |
I know you think you're God's gift for some bizarre reason but I will decide who I support without some jumped up internet keyboard warrior deciding for me thanks. I support Leicester and Ipswich but Ipswich come first. |
If you are going to use a term like ‘jumped up keyboard warrior’, I suggest you look in a mirror first.
Good city Leicester. Like it. Mrs Cs family all come from there. I have probably seen more Leicester games than you have but I’d no more support them than fly to the moon.
Which of Man C, Chelsea, Liverpool or United do you also ‘support’? |  | | |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 08:46 - Nov 5 with 323 views | wkj |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 23:01 - Nov 4 by BouncebackIpswich |
Thanks for taking your L. Night night. |
This is the crescendo of a long case of "grow up" on this thread. Asserting someone is "taking an L" because you can't handle some heat on an unpopular opinion or a vapid "anti-fan" style of posting paints the insecurity in your corner and yours alone. | |
| |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 13:53 - Nov 5 with 226 views | billlm |
To cautious, the brakes on all the time |  | | |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 14:01 - Nov 5 with 211 views | weepingx2018 |
loads of down votes but i agree - i said to my son at the time why rest Nunez & Jack???? they are in the moment right now but have now lost that momentum, certainly Nunez I imagine |  | | |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 14:13 - Nov 5 with 183 views | positivity |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 14:01 - Nov 5 by weepingx2018 |
loads of down votes but i agree - i said to my son at the time why rest Nunez & Jack???? they are in the moment right now but have now lost that momentum, certainly Nunez I imagine |
we don't know the full picture though, taylor has barely played this season, budgies moaned that nunez rarely managed 3 game weeks.
sometimes you have to manage and prevent injuries proactively rather than just react to them after the fact | |
| |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 14:33 - Nov 5 with 161 views | BouncebackIpswich |
| Kierans cost us 3 points there on 08:46 - Nov 5 by wkj |
This is the crescendo of a long case of "grow up" on this thread. Asserting someone is "taking an L" because you can't handle some heat on an unpopular opinion or a vapid "anti-fan" style of posting paints the insecurity in your corner and yours alone. |
Point taken and accepted. My fault for allowing myself to get wound up by the resident wind up merchant, 3 or 4 beers probably didn't help.
Feeling a lot more circumspect about the performance this morning, we played well and would have won that game most of the time. However I still stand by the original point, dropping 2 in form players in MN and JT was an unnecessary move and with all the players talking about the need to gel, Kieran is not assisting that process by constantly chopping and changing | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
