| Stoke look quite good btw 12:57 - Nov 29 with 751 views | bournemouthblue | they look confident and move the ball at a good pace with purpose You'd hope both them and Coventry will at least try and go a bit more toe to toe with us |  |
| |  |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:20 - Nov 29 with 146 views | gainsboroughblue | Not so good now. |  |
|  |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:21 - Nov 29 with 145 views | bournemouthblue |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:16 - Nov 29 by Bent_double | Another thing we're not doing this season is running teams into the ground. Two seasons ago, we were relentless, once the ref blew the final whistle in many games some of the opposition players would just lay on the pitch, exhausted, probably thinking, "wtf just happened?" Not happening so much this season - could be that every other team has upped their fitness levels, or we just don't push as much as we should. Or a combination of the two, who knows. I know we shouldn't still be harking back to how it was last time in the Championship, so much has changed, KM needs to change his approach a bit too. |
Wrexham I think were knackered to be fair Oxford's fitness levels good, there might be an element of two away games on the trot, playing part of that too We were definitely a bit off |  |
|  |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:24 - Nov 29 with 112 views | bournemouthblue |
It isn't, Hull do have some options they didn't have on Tuesday Matt Crooks and John Lundstram do add more quality |  |
|  |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:27 - Nov 29 with 99 views | RedX | Crooks is a fantastic player for this division. |  | |  |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:52 - Nov 29 with 24 views | bournemouthblue |
| Stoke look quite good btw on 14:27 - Nov 29 by RedX | Crooks is a fantastic player for this division. |
Yeh I have always liked him, he's kind of a targetman number 10, he'd be useful for us There aren't many of those about |  |
|  |
| |