| Group I is a stinker (n/t) 19:09 - Dec 5 with 653 views | RIPbobby |
|  | | |  |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 19:23 - Dec 5 with 575 views | berkstractorboy |
And Group B looks like a breeze in comparison |  | | |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 19:31 - Dec 5 with 524 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Only need to finish ahead of 1 other team to get through to the next stage.
Group I should see the qualifier bottom but France and Senegal would certainly have to go some to finish bottom.
Group B is nice for one of the hosts. Group A and D slightly less so. All three are fairly evenly matched between all the teams so should be interesting.
Of course, there is supposed to be incentive for finishing top to avoid the better sides as the competition progresses. However, if those supposed better sides don't win their groups, it won't work like that anyway! |  |
| |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 19:38 - Dec 5 with 481 views | RIPbobby |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 19:23 - Dec 5 by berkstractorboy |
And Group B looks like a breeze in comparison |
I don't think the French will like it at all. Senegal tore England apart and Norway are no mugs [Post edited 6 Dec 7:30]
| | | |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 19:41 - Dec 5 with 450 views | Crock |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 19:23 - Dec 5 by berkstractorboy |
And Group B looks like a breeze in comparison |
Group G aswell. And H and J. [Post edited 5 Dec 19:48]
|  |
| |
| Group I is a stinker (n/t) on 20:25 - Dec 5 with 329 views | Zx1988 |
Some utterly p*ss weak groups there. The joys of a 48-team World Cup.
Given the disparity in the women's game, their next WC will be an absolute bloodbath. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
