Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
F*** off Starmer 20:05 - Feb 28 with 3297 viewsZx1988

Perhaps you could grow a backbone and show some evidence for your alleged 'respect for international law', rather than brown-nosing Trump and Netenyoohoo, and warning Iran not to fight back.

Venezuela was pretty much a dry run for this, wasn't it? Launch an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation, and test the waters before hitting 'go' on the Big One.
[Post edited 28 Feb 20:06]

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

0
F*** off Starmer on 14:41 - Mar 2 with 319 viewsGlasgowBlue

F*** off Starmer on 13:56 - Mar 2 by SuperKieranMcKenna

They have used the ‘Axis of Resistance’ to for carry out their attacks on Syria and Yemen as well as western assets. Cognitive dissonance to claim otherwise- just because Russia used irregular forces to take Crimea and Donbas (prior to the current war) doesn’t mean they’ve not attacked anyone.

Those negotiations had nothing to do with the wanton slaughter of their own people either. At what point does intervention become acceptable - many Iranians have called for intervention to stop the slaughter of civilians. I don’t think the current actions will be enough to topple them without another uprising or coup from the army. Even Russia haven’t slaughtered, tortured and blinded 10,000’s of their own unarmed civilians- not sure awful even covers it.


Bully hates Israel and Zionism to such an extent that he is prepared to excuse a regime that jails women for showing their hair, executes homosexuals, funds terror across the region and brutally murders tens of thousands of its own citizens.

FREE IRAN FROM THE MULLAHS - FREE PALESTINE FROM HAMAS - FREE LEBANON FROM HEZBOLLAH
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

-1
F*** off Starmer on 15:29 - Mar 2 with 235 viewsitfcjoe

F*** off Starmer on 13:56 - Mar 2 by SuperKieranMcKenna

They have used the ‘Axis of Resistance’ to for carry out their attacks on Syria and Yemen as well as western assets. Cognitive dissonance to claim otherwise- just because Russia used irregular forces to take Crimea and Donbas (prior to the current war) doesn’t mean they’ve not attacked anyone.

Those negotiations had nothing to do with the wanton slaughter of their own people either. At what point does intervention become acceptable - many Iranians have called for intervention to stop the slaughter of civilians. I don’t think the current actions will be enough to topple them without another uprising or coup from the army. Even Russia haven’t slaughtered, tortured and blinded 10,000’s of their own unarmed civilians- not sure awful even covers it.


And after the US attacked them, they were always going to attack UK assets overseas so what choice did Starmer have?

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2026