Forum | I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... by unstableblue

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... 21:36 - Jul 17 with 1028 views

... but who started where... couldn’t understand from match report

Thanks

Poll:

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... on 21:39 - Jul 17 with 1017 views

According to Stuart Watson on twitter

Gerken
Spence Chambers Woolfenden Kenlock
Skuse Dozzell
Sears Nydam Ward
Waghorn

Poll:

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... on 21:44 - Jul 17 with 958 views

Me neither, would be useful to have all the positions in the match report, and also how did they line-up once Waghorn went off?

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... on 21:46 - Jul 17 with 933 views

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... on 21:39 - Jul 17 by RamRob
According to Stuart Watson on twitter Gerken Spence Chambers Woolfenden Kenlock Skuse Dozzell Sears Nydam Ward Waghorn

Well, yeah, that's the only one that makes immediate sense isn't it.

Poll:

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... on 23:26 - Jul 17 with 759 views

I understand the starting formation was 4-2-3-1... on 21:44 - Jul 17 by gordon
Me neither, would be useful to have all the positions in the match report, and also how did they line-up once Waghorn went off?

Sears went up top