Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Loanees 15:49 - Aug 10 with 988 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

....we can still get decent loanees in who are on high wages.

Rather than agreeing to pay a percentage of the players wage during the period of the loan, we can pay a higher loan fee to the parent club. This would in effect put the parent club in the same position as they would have been.

The EFL statement doesnt seem to suggest that loan fee's paid to clubs is covered by the salary cap.
[Post edited 10 Aug 2020 15:50]

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Loanees on 15:54 - Aug 10 with 965 viewsJ2BLUE

We also paid Finidi George for a long time after he left. If we bought someone for £200k who was on £6k a week with two years left on their deal is there any reason we couldn't offer £720k and have their club settle their deal based on £5k a week and then we sign them for £1k a week?

Also if Stoke really want Jackson they could re-sign Ward on a one year deal and loan him to us. Take his wage off the fee.

Same with Everton is they fancied doing Garbutt a favour.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Loanees on 16:00 - Aug 10 with 938 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Loanees on 15:54 - Aug 10 by J2BLUE

We also paid Finidi George for a long time after he left. If we bought someone for £200k who was on £6k a week with two years left on their deal is there any reason we couldn't offer £720k and have their club settle their deal based on £5k a week and then we sign them for £1k a week?

Also if Stoke really want Jackson they could re-sign Ward on a one year deal and loan him to us. Take his wage off the fee.

Same with Everton is they fancied doing Garbutt a favour.


One rule is that the salary cap basically covers any payments that benefit the player financially.

A loan fee doesn't, but any transfer fee that results in a payment to a player may be covered by the cap.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Loanees on 16:02 - Aug 10 with 926 viewsJ2BLUE

Loanees on 16:00 - Aug 10 by Marshalls_Mullet

One rule is that the salary cap basically covers any payments that benefit the player financially.

A loan fee doesn't, but any transfer fee that results in a payment to a player may be covered by the cap.


Not sure how that could be proven. The deal between the player and his club wouldn't be any of our business.

I think collectively we're seeing that this cap is going to be as rigid as clubs want it to be. It wouldn't surprise me to see clubs over the next 3-4 years go all out to beat it while we obey it completely like FFP.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Loanees on 16:03 - Aug 10 with 916 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Loanees on 16:02 - Aug 10 by J2BLUE

Not sure how that could be proven. The deal between the player and his club wouldn't be any of our business.

I think collectively we're seeing that this cap is going to be as rigid as clubs want it to be. It wouldn't surprise me to see clubs over the next 3-4 years go all out to beat it while we obey it completely like FFP.


I think the EFL would deem it as their business and will see all contracts / transfer deals.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Loanees on 16:04 - Aug 10 with 910 viewsJ2BLUE

Loanees on 16:03 - Aug 10 by Marshalls_Mullet

I think the EFL would deem it as their business and will see all contracts / transfer deals.


I just don't see how it could be proven. Maybe i'm wrong.

Truly impaired.
Poll: Will you buying a Super Blues membership?

0
Loanees on 16:09 - Aug 10 with 892 viewsMarshalls_Mullet

Loanees on 16:04 - Aug 10 by J2BLUE

I just don't see how it could be proven. Maybe i'm wrong.


I suspect details of all transfers have to be signed off and any incentives disclosed.

We would probably need to act fraudulently to avoid that.

Poll: Would Lambert have acheived better results than Cook if given the same resources

0
Loanees on 16:13 - Aug 10 with 873 viewskizaitfc

Think you may see a lot of this, maybe linked with a loan to buy with the future transfer fee being increased in the event the L1 club is promoted

Poll: Mick in or out? (not a dig at Mick just want to see the overall opinion on here)

0
Loanees on 16:16 - Aug 10 with 859 viewskizaitfc

Loanees on 16:09 - Aug 10 by Marshalls_Mullet

I suspect details of all transfers have to be signed off and any incentives disclosed.

We would probably need to act fraudulently to avoid that.


Queue the Lambert jokes

Poll: Mick in or out? (not a dig at Mick just want to see the overall opinion on here)

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025