Forum | Jackson and Huws in the 18 but not on the bench by Bluefish

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Jackson and Huws in the 18 but not on the bench 16:42 - Jan 16 with 405 views

Instead we have 2 target man strikers on the bench. Why would we not go for a target man striker and a runner?

We also have 0 midfielders on the bench, why wouldn't we sacrifice another wide forward for a midfielder?

It is weird

Poll:	Who has performed the worst but oddly loved the most?
Blog:	[Blog] Long Live King George

Jackson and Huws in the 18 but not on the bench on 16:44 - Jan 16 with 393 views

SpruceMoose

Any why type question relating to ITFC can simply be answered with a "because Lambert/Evans".

	Pronouns: He/Him/His. "Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
Poll:	Selectamod

Jackson and Huws in the 18 but not on the bench on 16:47 - Jan 16 with 343 views

jayessess

We've also declined to use all 5 subs, despite having 4 players coming back from injury, 3 players in the 30s and complaining about injuries and workloads all season.

Blog:

What Now? Taking a Look at Life in League One

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread