| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view 12:37 - Sep 26 with 1033 views | unstableblue |
Three things will win us games and get us into the play offs
1. Have the better players
2. Greater confidence, desire and energy
3. Better tactical and technical set up
We have 1 nailed.. this is such a talented group
My worry from what I have heard from yesterday is this confined lack of real fight/energy/desire
Jury very much out on 3, and that’s Cook
Having said that we had the chances to win yesterday
My Sheff Weds mate at the game (mates mates mates) stated the following:
- Sheff Weds were much better than recent games (not what mick said on the radio)
- he liked el Mizouni (goes against what I’ve read)
- but our central midfield were weak overall
- hutchinson their stand out
- Ipswich didn’t step up and grab the game which Weds were offering them
- our full backs too deep
|  |
| |  |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:46 - Sep 26 with 960 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Did Mick Mills say Wednesday had played worse than their previous games? I thought he said they weren't that good. Better than a draw with Shrewsbury and a heavy defeat to Plymouth is not the same as necessarily playing well.
The radio and others seem to be saying El Mizouni played well so not sure where your idea this Wednesday fan is a lone voice comes from.
Central midfield has been a problem but the result would suggest it wasn't as much of one yesterday. We can't rest all our hope on Morsy like some seem to be.
The full backs were missing KVY and Coulsen. Hopefully KVY will be fully fit and on form soon and Coulsen too. Penney was Cook's signing so it is a little odd he didn't get someone more suited to his system there. Donacien is doing a very decent job by all accounts whilst not being exactly the style we are after. I wonder whether Burns could get a go there against sides that will have less attacking threat than Wednesday did. |  |
| |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:52 - Sep 26 with 927 views | pointofblue |
If he thought our central midfield was weak I’m not sure what he made of Wednesday’s… non-existent?
I think confidence again was a huge issue and we shot our bolt from around mid way through the second half; we really struggled to play between the lines and changing the shape actually made things worse. Donacien is not an attacking full back but KVY has been struggling defensively. Penney did well in the first half but lost his way in the second, meaning we lost width. Celina had an off game which meant we struggled to link midfield with attack. Although he made a mess of it, Harper breaking through was an example of what we were missing. |  |
| |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:53 - Sep 26 with 917 views | unstableblue |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:46 - Sep 26 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Did Mick Mills say Wednesday had played worse than their previous games? I thought he said they weren't that good. Better than a draw with Shrewsbury and a heavy defeat to Plymouth is not the same as necessarily playing well.
The radio and others seem to be saying El Mizouni played well so not sure where your idea this Wednesday fan is a lone voice comes from.
Central midfield has been a problem but the result would suggest it wasn't as much of one yesterday. We can't rest all our hope on Morsy like some seem to be.
The full backs were missing KVY and Coulsen. Hopefully KVY will be fully fit and on form soon and Coulsen too. Penney was Cook's signing so it is a little odd he didn't get someone more suited to his system there. Donacien is doing a very decent job by all accounts whilst not being exactly the style we are after. I wonder whether Burns could get a go there against sides that will have less attacking threat than Wednesday did. |
The Weds fan said they’d played better than in recent games, and thought they were good
Mick Mills on the radio stated they were no that impressive
Hope that’s clearer!
Coulson is a key player in Cooks system, hopefully he’s not out for long
KVY is weak defensively at present, but will come good
Sheff Weds had a very strong front 3 and seems we kept them in check, which is a positive | |
| |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:57 - Sep 26 with 895 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:53 - Sep 26 by unstableblue |
The Weds fan said they’d played better than in recent games, and thought they were good
Mick Mills on the radio stated they were no that impressive
Hope that’s clearer!
Coulson is a key player in Cooks system, hopefully he’s not out for long
KVY is weak defensively at present, but will come good
Sheff Weds had a very strong front 3 and seems we kept them in check, which is a positive |
Ah, so a Wednesday fan who has seen his team struggle has lower standards on what is a good performance than Mick Mills does. Fair enough. I think this goes back to Maki's argument over the "older generation" wanting to see effective winning football while the younger generation are just happy with improved performances.
Agree with the rest but just feel that the back-up Cook got in should have been more suited to Cook's system than Penney appears to be. | |
| |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 13:17 - Sep 26 with 830 views | unstableblue |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:57 - Sep 26 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Ah, so a Wednesday fan who has seen his team struggle has lower standards on what is a good performance than Mick Mills does. Fair enough. I think this goes back to Maki's argument over the "older generation" wanting to see effective winning football while the younger generation are just happy with improved performances.
Agree with the rest but just feel that the back-up Cook got in should have been more suited to Cook's system than Penney appears to be. |
Most Wednesday fans on their forum think they were poor yesterday
Just sharing the view of one fan… sounds a biased view
But first half mick Mills was really stating Weds were poor and we just weren’t taking the game to them | |
| |
| Confidence. Edwards and Chaplin to break the lines? on 13:22 - Sep 26 with 805 views | unstableblue |
| Somethings a bit worrying in the Unstable model, Sheff Weds fan view on 12:52 - Sep 26 by pointofblue |
If he thought our central midfield was weak I’m not sure what he made of Wednesday’s… non-existent?
I think confidence again was a huge issue and we shot our bolt from around mid way through the second half; we really struggled to play between the lines and changing the shape actually made things worse. Donacien is not an attacking full back but KVY has been struggling defensively. Penney did well in the first half but lost his way in the second, meaning we lost width. Celina had an off game which meant we struggled to link midfield with attack. Although he made a mess of it, Harper breaking through was an example of what we were missing. |
As I stated in point 2, winning has a LOT to do with confidence, and desire, we still seem weak in this area, and heads drop.. cool and the players are starting to bang on about the dressing room atmosphere… need to see it on the pitch
Yes Celina did sound poor on radio.. Fraser however sounded a stand out player… so how we get Edwards into the team to give us pace to break the lines… Harper and Chaplin perhaps Harlow a role | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
