Fantastic player but we are Ipswich Town FC not Macauley Bonne FC 13:00 - Nov 4 with 989 views | MaySixth | we have the squad and players to cope without him and don't need the fixture congestion if it comes to it I think we should play the games rather than postpone |  |
| |  |
Fantastic player but we are Ipswich Town FC not Macauley Bonne FC on 13:02 - Nov 4 with 965 views | jaykay | agree with this. say you moonlighting on wycombes forum last night |  |
| forensic experts say footers and spruces fingerprints were not found at the scene after the weekends rows |
|  |
Fantastic player but we are Ipswich Town FC not Macauley Bonne FC on 13:15 - Nov 4 with 902 views | Marshalls_Mullet | we def should. we also need to be getting game time for piggott so that we are not over reliant on Bonne |  |
|  |
Fantastic player but we are Ipswich Town FC not Macauley Bonne FC on 13:19 - Nov 4 with 867 views | tonybied |
Fantastic player but we are Ipswich Town FC not Macauley Bonne FC on 13:15 - Nov 4 by Marshalls_Mullet | we def should. we also need to be getting game time for piggott so that we are not over reliant on Bonne |
The fantastic thing this season is that although Bonne is our top scorer we have plenty of others chipping in with goals too, so being without him maybe not great but we can rely on the rest of the team to chip in even if Piggott struggles. [Post edited 4 Nov 2021 13:20]
|  | |  |
Fantastic player but we are Ipswich Town FC not Macauley Bonne FC on 13:38 - Nov 4 with 783 views | HighgateBlue |
Let's hope the EADT is correct. The TWTD new article seems to take a different view ("looks set to miss..."). |  | |  |
| |