That was definitely a penalty (n/t) 15:08 - Aug 20 with 1321 views | GlasgowBlue | |  |
| |  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:09 - Aug 20 with 1310 views | DanTheMan | I'd love to have seen a replay of that because I fail to see how that wasn't given. |  |
|  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:10 - Aug 20 with 1276 views | Bobsthename |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:09 - Aug 20 by DanTheMan | I'd love to have seen a replay of that because I fail to see how that wasn't given. |
Definitely. |  | |  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:12 - Aug 20 with 1222 views | BarcaBlue | Looked like he was completely wiped out from behind. Camera a bit far away but from the tv seemed a clear pen. |  | |  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:19 - Aug 20 with 1087 views | GlasgowBlue |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:12 - Aug 20 by BarcaBlue | Looked like he was completely wiped out from behind. Camera a bit far away but from the tv seemed a clear pen. |
|  |
|  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:26 - Aug 20 with 956 views | DanTheMan |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:19 - Aug 20 by GlasgowBlue | |
Stonewall. That's possibly one of the worst decisions I've ever seen. |  |
|  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 16:01 - Aug 20 with 756 views | GeoffSentence | Of course it wasn't a penalty. It's in the addendum to the EFL rule book. Rule 12.E foul play in the penalty area (exceptions) It shall not be considered a penalty if the player offended against is appearing for Ipswich Town. The ref got it spot on. |  |
|  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 16:11 - Aug 20 with 675 views | Ryorry |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:26 - Aug 20 by DanTheMan | Stonewall. That's possibly one of the worst decisions I've ever seen. |
Shocking. How is this ref even on the list? (rhetorical q). |  |
|  |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 16:14 - Aug 20 with 655 views | BlueBoots |
That was definitely a penalty (n/t) on 15:19 - Aug 20 by GlasgowBlue | |
How have not just the ref, but his assistants, looked at that and thought that's fine? Even if he got the ball (and didn't look like he got a foot to it), he's gone straight through the back of KVY so would be a pen anyway. Bonkers! |  |
|  |
| |