| Harness 12:50 - Oct 22 with 1063 views | nick141 |
Did anyone else think that Harness looked absolutely knackered after about an hour last night? I was hoping edwards would come on (even after the goal, so he could press better).
Thought the lack of subs was a bit curious, but fair play we won! Shame our two mids are out just before camara is back but hey.
Nevertheless, I am hugely positive. Massive win that stops any negative momentum (although that doesn’t stop the negative old blokes around me in the SAR!) |  | | |  |
| Harness on 13:02 - Oct 22 with 1014 views | LeoMuff |
He had a strange game I thought, lost a lot of possession but looked most likely to break the lines, pressed well. I would have got Edwards involved at some point. |  |
| |
| Harness on 13:26 - Oct 22 with 932 views | Basuco |
He was my MOM, did a huge amount of running and picked up a lot of loose balls in mid-field and was always looking to drive forward. I would be interested in seeing what distance Harness, Burns and JJ did in the course of last night. |  | | |
| Harness on 13:30 - Oct 22 with 907 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
I didn't notice that. The only one who really looked done was Curtis Davis who stayed on despite being clearly injured. I think Edwards would have come on had we still not scored.
I wonder if Humphreys will start alongside Ball on Tuesday. I was impressed with Ball when he came on. |  |
| |
| Harness on 14:18 - Oct 22 with 775 views | RegencyBlue |
| Harness on 13:02 - Oct 22 by LeoMuff |
He had a strange game I thought, lost a lot of possession but looked most likely to break the lines, pressed well. I would have got Edwards involved at some point. |
I thought that.
Did a lot of good work but the final ball was more often than not poor. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
