By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Can someone explain the logic of this. on 20:09 - Sep 27 by bluelagos
As a deterrence to stop him re-entering again?
Presumably he will be deported again once he has served his sentence.
There's not a lot of detail in the newspaper report but. as they give an Ipswich address for him and refer to his wife (who may be English or have permission to reside in the United Kingdom) it sounds slightly complicated. Perhaps the idea is to start his sentence here and deport him to finish the term in his country of birth, once the paperwork has been completed ?
Can someone explain the logic of this. on 20:39 - Sep 27 by WeWereZombies
There's not a lot of detail in the newspaper report but. as they give an Ipswich address for him and refer to his wife (who may be English or have permission to reside in the United Kingdom) it sounds slightly complicated. Perhaps the idea is to start his sentence here and deport him to finish the term in his country of birth, once the paperwork has been completed ?
There is some process to follow - the courts can't deport rather than sentence people. The home secretary has a duty to issue a deportation order where a foreign criminal has been sentenced for more than 12 months and this can be complicated by appeals etc. Services have been cut to the bone all over the place and so not enough trained HO staff to do this quickly. People should be annoyed about this rather than trousers.
0
Can someone explain the logic of this. on 21:35 - Sep 27 with 964 views
Can someone explain the logic of this. on 21:26 - Sep 27 by jontysnut
There is some process to follow - the courts can't deport rather than sentence people. The home secretary has a duty to issue a deportation order where a foreign criminal has been sentenced for more than 12 months and this can be complicated by appeals etc. Services have been cut to the bone all over the place and so not enough trained HO staff to do this quickly. People should be annoyed about this rather than trousers.
Although he had previously been deported so would there be anything legal / appeals to argue about?
*that's based on my assumption the previous deportation followed legal / appeals procedure.
0
Can someone explain the logic of this. on 22:34 - Sep 27 with 813 views