By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
"The Prime Minister is entirely well aware [of the corruption]....and decided to on 08:24 - Mar 28 by Herbivore
Yeah, this could be referring to pretty much anything really.
It is probably obvious to those who know what it's about. But to those of us lost in the mire of brexit and relegation, well me anyway, whatever it has has bypassed me completely.
"The Prime Minister is entirely well aware [of the corruption]....and decided to on 08:27 - Mar 28 by GeoffSentence
It is probably obvious to those who know what it's about. But to those of us lost in the mire of brexit and relegation, well me anyway, whatever it has has bypassed me completely.
I just listened to it, it's about the fact that the leave campaign broke electoral law.
"The Prime Minister is entirely well aware [of the corruption]....and decided to on 13:20 - Mar 28 by XYZ
Apologies for lack of context.
It was her QC arguing that exercising Article 50 was legal because she knew all about the illegality and had decided to carry on.
Wilson -v- the PM - the case was dismissed for being politically motivated, effectively.
Interesting can you expand or provide some links please. I was aware a number of those on the right were going to challenge the legality of A50 & the following negotiations but had heard nothing as to the progress of the plaintifs case
0
"The Prime Minister is entirely well aware [of the corruption]....and decided to on 14:11 - Mar 28 with 935 views
"The Prime Minister is entirely well aware [of the corruption]....and decided to on 13:39 - Mar 28 by Swansea_Blue
It's bonkers. It's legal because the PM knew that laws were breached. Get your head around that piece of 'logic'.
I think their claim (Wilsons's legal team) was that her decision was void because she didn't take the illegality into account. If she had, the argument went, then she wouldn't have viewed the referendum result as reliable.
Her QC argued that she was aware of all the illegality and carried on anyway.
I don't think the court decided on the point as the claim was dismissed for being "politically motivated".
As Home Secretary she must have been (one would hope) aware of Aaron Banks playing footsie with the Russians and other stuff. Then as PM, one presumes, she received all intelligence reports about the referendum.
It has been alleged that she blocked an MI5 investigation into Banks' dealings.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
