| Isnt no statement better than a statement? 19:04 - Mar 3 with 649 views | chrismakin |
Considering the twitter likes of Brett.
The story yesturday about playford road etc etc
Isnt it better and more respectful of supporters to not say anything rather than lie that there isnt anything going on.
These arent just rumours. They're actual facts being found out. [Post edited 3 Mar 2021 19:06]
|  |
| |  |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:10 - Mar 3 with 584 views | DublinBlue84 |
Personally I think there is a game of negotiating in public happening.
Brett liking tweets is putting pressure on Marcus to sell the club that can only push the price down. Johnson probably is an intelligent fellow and knows that most fans want the club to be sold and if the pressure increases on Evans enough, that will impact on what Evans can demand in exchange for the club.
Meanwhile Evans saying that the current offer for the club is not good enough, which is what essentially he has said tonight. This seems to be bore out of a desire to change the narrative from being one of pressuring Evans to sell, to trying to pressure the others to increase their currently unacceptable offer, pushing the price etc up.
Basically the fans are a pawn in this game at the moment and are being used as leverage for both sides who are trying to push the price down or the price up respectively. [Post edited 3 Mar 2021 19:13]
|  |
| |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:12 - Mar 3 with 556 views | chrismakin |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:10 - Mar 3 by DublinBlue84 |
Personally I think there is a game of negotiating in public happening.
Brett liking tweets is putting pressure on Marcus to sell the club that can only push the price down. Johnson probably is an intelligent fellow and knows that most fans want the club to be sold and if the pressure increases on Evans enough, that will impact on what Evans can demand in exchange for the club.
Meanwhile Evans saying that the current offer for the club is not good enough, which is what essentially he has said tonight. This seems to be bore out of a desire to change the narrative from being one of pressuring Evans to sell, to trying to pressure the others to increase their currently unacceptable offer, pushing the price etc up.
Basically the fans are a pawn in this game at the moment and are being used as leverage for both sides who are trying to push the price down or the price up respectively. [Post edited 3 Mar 2021 19:13]
|
But you wouldn't get that playford road investigation unless things were pretty much agreed and it's got far enough to do so. Certainly wouldn't be done at negotiation stage surely. | |
| |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:16 - Mar 3 with 464 views | DublinBlue84 |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:12 - Mar 3 by chrismakin |
But you wouldn't get that playford road investigation unless things were pretty much agreed and it's got far enough to do so. Certainly wouldn't be done at negotiation stage surely. |
Is it possible that there is more than one element to the deal?
I know there was talk about Evans retaining hold of part of the land the training ground is on. Maybe Evans has not agreed to sell everything the consortium would like to buy? | |
| |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:17 - Mar 3 with 444 views | RegencyBlue |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:12 - Mar 3 by chrismakin |
But you wouldn't get that playford road investigation unless things were pretty much agreed and it's got far enough to do so. Certainly wouldn't be done at negotiation stage surely. |
Evans might be trying a bit of grandstanding in public to up the price maybe.
If he manages to screw the deal at the last minute I think he will be in for a surprise at season ticket renewal time! |  | | |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:18 - Mar 3 with 426 views | chrismakin |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:16 - Mar 3 by DublinBlue84 |
Is it possible that there is more than one element to the deal?
I know there was talk about Evans retaining hold of part of the land the training ground is on. Maybe Evans has not agreed to sell everything the consortium would like to buy? |
Hmm maybe you're right
Could be they dont want the club itself it's all about the training land development potential | |
| |
| Isnt no statement better than a statement? on 19:34 - Mar 3 with 355 views | BlueBorn86 |
I see Matt Slater has commented that he thinks the statement is down to him signing an NDA with the investors. However, I still don’t get why you’d make the statement at all if that was the case? Surely you’d leave the LON statement out there and leave it at that.
All a funny ol’ game. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
