Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Must say, my issue today is the first half not the 2nd 17:19 - Oct 30 with 401 viewschrismakin

It's the 2nd we lost the game of course, but the sub changes etc, moved the game into our favour and really we should have at least drawn that game.

My main gripe tho is that initial lineup, which we've all discussed on various threads.

Overall it's just a bit annoying we didn't get at least a point from that. But also a positive that if that's the best of the league, then we don't have 2 much to worry about when we have our first choice or closest to first choice 11 available as per last week.

But the coulson pick etc, really odd and can't happen again.

Never be afraid to share your thoughts.
Poll: As TWTD polls influence Ashton.. what should he have for breakfast tomorrow?
Blog: We Need to Go Back to the Past to Go Forwards

1
Must say, my issue today is the first half not the 2nd on 18:07 - Oct 30 with 302 viewspointofblue

It wasn't just playing Coulsen but why play him on the right? Why not have him and left back and move Penney, who does show some ability going forwards, on left wing, with Edwards on the right? Did he think Woolfenden would be exposed at right back? Even if so, playing an out of position left back in front of him is hardly going to help.

Cook's idiocy goes further in not taking Vincent-Young to Plymouth (I read this was the case rather than an injury). I suppose he thought if Donacien fell ill then Burns could fall back as well as Woolfenden being around as cover - losing both was a blow. Was Fraser injured or omitted too? Without him, Aluko, Burns and a match fit Celina we were lacking.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025