| We have the players for 352 20:51 - Nov 29 with 504 views | 3_5_2 |
Hear me out....
Provides 5 in midfield and natural width - 3 in centre mid, can have a deeper player when defending - We have the defenders to do it and would mean 2 up top which would see less turnovers from high balls we presently hit to Bonne on his own (not his game but he does well considering) and we get a proven striker on the pitch
My team would be:
Walton
JD Fridge Burgess (Across the 18 yard box)
Burns / Aluko Evans Mors Fraser Celina / Edwards (When one side goes, the other stays. More crosses for headers (Pigs) and feet (Bonne)
Pigs Bonne (
If all 4 wide players were fit, I would ask the starters to run at them as often as possible, work their socks off and replace when getting tired
Two up top
Discuss [Post edited 29 Nov 2021 20:55]
|  |
| |  |
| We have the players for 352 on 20:59 - Nov 29 with 463 views | Darth_Koont |
Might work. But is that any different from the current potential of our 4231.
And without Celina or Edwards playing wingback? |  |
| |
| We have the players for 352 on 21:04 - Nov 29 with 434 views | 3_5_2 |
| We have the players for 352 on 20:59 - Nov 29 by Darth_Koont |
Might work. But is that any different from the current potential of our 4231.
And without Celina or Edwards playing wingback? |
having 3 x cb is key, moving one into midfield means you outnumber most teams in there and with our attacking threat, the game would be more at their end than ours.
Having 2 strikers gives us Bonne (usually a good box player) and pigs who has yet to see a decent cross for him to attack that I can remember - Ties up the back 4, we can push higher up the park | |
| |
| We have the players for 352 on 22:07 - Nov 29 with 357 views | Chrisd |
We do and it might just work, but the only slight problem I foresee is that our manager rarely - if at all - changes the formation. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
