I think that’s the highest per player ratings I can remember this season, by f 23:47 - Oct 4 with 720 views | unstableblue | Cambridge are not a poor side, they are athletic and well coached. They showed a few moments of their shape and potential. But we just dominated the ball. We had so many players on 8/10… and given our superior squad it just meant we were always going to win. If our players had performed that well at Sheff Weds and Plymouth we would have walked those games. Edmundson was just quality and just dominant - 9/10 Wolfie and Donacien were 7 or 8 / 10 Morsy I though was back at his best 8/10 Ball was pretty good., not crisp enough at time 7/10 Davis and Burns were actually miles off the Pompey display - perhaps 7/10 only Chaplin was pretty good but dominant at 7/10 Harness was absolute quality, some of his body movement today was top draw and his passing - this guy is what we’ve misse 8/10 Freddie was sooooo good with his hold up and closing 8/10 Then Evans and Edwards came in with 9/10s… our Welsh wizard was pinging those balls so effectively If we can keep these players performing at that level we get automatic [Post edited 4 Oct 2022 23:48]
|  |
| |  |
I think that’s the highest per player ratings I can remember this season, by f on 23:52 - Oct 4 with 636 views | SitfcB | I don’t do player ratings very often but when I do I’m still sad it isn’t the stars anymore. |  |
|  |
I think that’s the highest per player ratings I can remember this season, by f on 09:08 - Oct 5 with 396 views | ArnoldMoorhen | TJJs directness made a difference, too. At the risk of daring to question KM... My observation from last night (lower SAR, so great view of this) was that Ladappo, Harness and Chaplin were all working hard, being busy, buzzing around the edge of the area and unselfiahly sliding balls in... ...which then meant there was nobody there to finish them. I would prefer TJJ to play with two of those three, or one of them needs to be more selfish. |  | |  |
| |