Forum | Chappers! :D (n/t) by DanTheMan

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Chappers! :D (n/t) 15:33 - Feb 24 with 654 views

DanTheMan

Was that offside? Can't tell on the replay. My initial thought was that it was.

[Post edited 24 Feb 15:34]

Poll:

FM Parallel Game Week 1 (Fulham) - Available Team

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:34 - Feb 24 with 617 views

Illinoisblue

Cheeky finish. COYB

	62 - 78 - 81
Poll:	What sport is the most corrupt?

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:35 - Feb 24 with 573 views

Trequartista

Can't tell either but it was a deliberate flick, not a deflection as my commentator is insisting.

Poll:

Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:36 - Feb 24 with 570 views

Scuzzer

Certainly looked off.
What we need is VAR.

Established 1968

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:36 - Feb 24 with 546 views

crouchendyachtclub

Watching the Birmingham blues tv stream and they’ve described it as scrappy and called it a deflection twice. Huge disservice to Chappers there.

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:37 - Feb 24 with 514 views

tonybied

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:34 - Feb 24 by Illinoisblue
Cheeky finish. COYB

Looked off to me but no conclusive angle. If it was it's about time a wrong decision went our way at a decisive point in a game.

[Post edited 24 Feb 15:38]

Chappers! :D (n/t) on 15:43 - Feb 24 with 431 views

Swansea_Blue

I paused TownTV and even though he was goal side of one CB, the one next to him appeared to be level. Not a good angle of course, but the shadow on the pitch makes a reasonable guide and they were both equidistant to that.

So if he was offside, it was very tight and not obviously off. The TV angle and fact he was goal side of one CB made it look worse than it was.

Poll:

Do you think Pert is key to all of this?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread