| Who are the pricks on here who tried to argue the IOPC are unfair to the police? 14:13 - Jun 27 with 709 views | bluelagos |
Just heard, first hand, that they dismissed a number of complaints from Hillsborough survivors about the fact that the West Midlands Police repeatedly quizzed survivors over their alcohol consumption at Hillsborough in interviews in the weeks after the disaster.
The IOPC have ruled it was a legitimate line of questioning for WMP officers.
The same WMP that didn't quiz David Duckenfield about his alcohol consumption and indeed he was unable to say where he was for 2 hours in the build up to the match at the inquests and his trial.
The police social club, Niagra was one of his possible hangouts, but no one established whether he had visited and at his trial he couldn't recall where he had been for 2 hours. His memory loss matched by his official driver who drove him somewhere but couldn't recall where.
So the IOPC have basically ruled it was all ok the WMP to try and collect evidence that fitted the SYP false claims about drunken fans.
Cover ups are now officially all good it seems.
IOPC are now firmly in the gutter along with WMP and SYP officers. And these are the guys that are supposed to keep the police in line.
|  |
| |  |
| Who are the pricks on here who tried to argue the IOPC are unfair to the police? on 14:34 - Jun 27 with 620 views | EdwardStone |
I like to think that the Police, the Courts and the Planning system will really buy into this new idea of operating with honesty and candour
They will no longer lie, mislead or disremember
There will be punishments and sanctions for those who keep the old bad habits
Judgement will be made by...errrr....Courts and Police if there is any case to answer
Somehow the concept of candour and integrity seems terminally undermined |  | | |
| Who are the pricks on here who tried to argue the IOPC are unfair to the police? on 15:24 - Jun 27 with 528 views | bluelagos |
| Who are the pricks on here who tried to argue the IOPC are unfair to the police? on 14:34 - Jun 27 by EdwardStone |
I like to think that the Police, the Courts and the Planning system will really buy into this new idea of operating with honesty and candour
They will no longer lie, mislead or disremember
There will be punishments and sanctions for those who keep the old bad habits
Judgement will be made by...errrr....Courts and Police if there is any case to answer
Somehow the concept of candour and integrity seems terminally undermined |
The police killed 97 and then lied about it. Nil convictions.
The police covered up doing it. Nil convictions.
Now the IOPC has ruled that the act of repeatedly questioning fans about their drinking was perfectly legitimate.
They are nothing more than apologists for the SY and WM police. The pretense that we have a system of holding bent coppers to account is laughable.
British justice in all it's glory. Ok to kill people and lie about, cover it up, if you are a police officer. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
